Please upgrade to the latest version of Flash Player.

Click here if you already have Flash Player installed.

Please upgrade to the latest version of Flash Player.

Click here if you already have Flash Player installed.

Plastic Surgeon Dr. Michele Koo’s Blog | St. Louis | Kansas City 2010 January

Archive for January, 2010

Obesity and Weight Control - Some Basic Vocabuluary and Facts

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Nutrition 101

Weight gain is caused by consuming more calories than the body uses.

  • The average person uses as many as 2,500 calories daily, or 17,500 calories per week.
  • If you eat the amount your body needs, you will maintain your weight. It takes 3,500 extra calories to gain 1 pound.
  • To lose weight, you must consume fewer calories than your body uses. You must eat 3,500 calories less than you need, say 500 calories per day for 1 week, to lose 1 pound.

Calories count. It’s important to understand where calories come from and how to make the smartest food selections. Here are some basics:

  • Foods are composed of the following 3 substances, in varying amounts:
    • Carbohydrates (4 Calories per gram) - Examples include grains, cereal, pasta, sugar, fruits, and vegetables
    • Protein (4 Calories per gram) - Examples include legumes (beans, dried peas, lentils), seafood, low-fat dairy, lean meats, and soy products such as tofu
    • Fats (9 Calories per gram) - Examples include whole-fat dairy products, butter, oils, and nuts

Alcohol is a separate fourth group (7 Calories per gram).

A calorie is the amount of energy (heat) needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. A kilocalorie (or Calorie with a capital C) is the amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of 1 kilogram of water by 1 degree Celsius.

  • The energy contained in food is measured in kilocalories but is commonly referred to on food packages and elsewhere as calories.
  • Most people underestimate the number of calories they consume by about 30%.
  • Calculate the number of calories you should consume each day to keep your weight the same.
    • If you are moderately active, multiply your weight in pounds by 15.
    • If you are sedentary, multiply by 13 instead.
    • To lose weight, you need to eat less than this number.

Excess calories from any source (even fat-free foods) will turn into body fat.

  • Any carbohydrate not immediately used for energy will be stored in the liver as glycogen for short-term use. The body has only a limited number of liver cells to store the glycogen. Whatever is left over will be converted to fat.
  • Excess protein and fat in the diet are also stored as fat.

Fat cells are no longer thought to be responsible only for energy storage and release.

  • They synthesize the hormone leptin, which travels to the hypothalamus in the brain and regulates appetite, body weight, and the storage of fat.
  • Leptin was first discovered in 1994. The exact way it works is not yet fully understood.
  • Disorders of leptin account for only a few cases of obesity, usually morbid (extreme) obesity.

Blog continued on HCG Diet and How to Maintain and Lose Weight

MOMMY MAKEOVER - Part II - Life After Childbearing is Definitely Possible

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

The body mass index, calculated from the patient’s height and weight in metric units of kilograms per meter squared, is a good method with which to assess the patient’s relative risk-to-benefit ratio for the procedure. Although liposuction may reduce cardiovascular risk, blood pressure, and fasting insulin levels, it should not be considered a treatment for obesity. Patients with inherent risks including those with poor wound healing, infection, deep venous thrombosis, sleep apnea, or a body mass index greater than 30 would benefit from additional counseling, and lifestyle modification should be considered before a body-contouring procedure.

Dr Koo performs a thorough physical examination which includes documentation of the patient’s height, weight, and circumferences of all pertinent body areas. Dr Koo will look at all previous surgical scars including, of course, a possible previous C Section scar and will attempt to remove all possible scars and stretch marks that are within the area that can be removed with an abdominoplasty.

Typically, Dr Koo recommends waiting a minimum of 6 months after childbirth prior to considering any plastic surgery to reshape the breasts and body. This allows time to lose the water weight gain, establish good eating and exercise habits, and allows the skin to retract. With weight and skin tone stabilization, the breasts and abdomen will revert to as mich of the pre-pregancy condition that is possible. For some women, depending on activity level, eating habits, and genetics, this could take up to one or more years.

Dr Koo also recommends waiting until the patient is not considering any more children before major skin resection such as a tummy tuck (abdominoplasty) to prevent relapse of stretch and split of the abdominal muscles again with recurrent pregnancies.

The saggy, flat breasts and lax, loose abdomen and hanging skin can all be removed and abdominal muscles tightened completely to a pre-pregnancy state. The maintenance of the shape and appearance is then up to the patient to continue to eat healthy with regular activity levels which Dr Koo encourages and helps with suggested excercise classes and trainers. If the patient is looking for firm, lifted breasts that are full and round, then a breast implant along with the breast lift may be necessary. She will discuss all the possibilities and let the patient know what surgery is in her best interest for long term results.

Lipodystrophy can be located in the following areas: abdomen, flanks, thighs, arms, neck, knees, back, buttocks, and breasts. Careful physical examination entails site-specific evaluation. Dr Michele Koo examines patients for the presence of occult hernias. Men who present for abdominal liposuction should be examined with particular care, as abdominal prominence may often be attributed to intraabdominal fat, which is not addressed by liposuction. In men interested in body contouring of the anterior chest, the examination of those with gynecomastia may direct the method of surgical treatment. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction or direct excision of skin and breast tissue may be necessary in those with additional fibrous tissue.

Other anatomical areas that require special attention if liposuction is to be performed are the legs and ankles. Patient satisfaction is not as high with liposuction in these areas. Pain can be a prolonged problem and complications are more frequent than with liposuction of most other areas. It is important to understand the patterns of fat distribution and how they relate to the anatomy of the area. The preoperative markings, careful attention to the suction area, and close postoperative follow-up are extremely important for liposuction of the legs and ankles.

Skin evaluation is pertinent in the evaluation of any patient seeking body-contouring procedures. For those seeking liposuction, adequate skin elasticity should be present to allow for skin retraction after surgery. Particular attention should be given to associated wrinkles, laxity, and surface irregularities, including dimpling. Scars should be noted.

Cellulite is a term that is used to describe the lipomatous deposits under the skin that outwardly give the skin a lumpy or orange peel-like appearance. Cellulite is often noted in areas such as the hips, buttocks, or thighs. Cellulite is predetermined by genetics, so even thin women can develop the appearance. Factors such as hormones, pregnancy, and aging may all attribute to the appearance of cellulite. Patients should be aware that liposuction procedures do not address cellulite and may in fact worsen its appearance. In contrast, dimpling is usually considered to be a more isolated area of concavity that may be secondary to underlying scar or fascial attachments and may be improved by the liposuction process.

Any asymmetry or contour irregularities is noted and brought to the patient’s attention. Dr Koo makes additional effort to correct any dimpling or asymmetry intraoperatively; however, this is frequently difficult to achieve. The patient should be aware of possible persistent asymmetry, depressions, and dimpling after the liposuction procedure.

Society of Anesthesiologists status of a patient before scheduling liposuction because it is an important factor in determining the most appropriate location for the procedure to be performed safely.

Various types of anesthesia or anesthesia combinations are appropriate for liposuction, depending on the overall health of the patient, the estimated volume of the aspirate to be removed, and the postoperative discharge plan. Dr Michele Koo is extremely careful about her anesthesia provider and hand picks those that give anesthesia to her patients. Dr Koo is the patients’ best advocate and ensures that all precautions are taken for the safety and well being of her patients.

In smaller volume liposuction cases, anesthetic infiltrate solutions alone may provide adequate pain relief. Termed wetting solution, this anesthetic infiltration solution not only facilitates the procedure but also provides preemptive and prolonged postoperative local analgesia.

5 Doses of lidocaine up to 50 mg/kg have been used; however, it is important to note that plasma lidocaine levels can peak 10 to 12 hours after infiltration when epinephrine is present in the wetting solution. Lidocaine toxicity has been implicated in a series of liposuction-related deaths. Signs and symptoms of lidocaine toxicity can be seen at plasma levels between 3 and 6 μg/ml. Initially, patients may experience lightheadedness, drowsiness, tinnitus, a metallic taste in the mouth, slurred speech, and numbness of the lips and tongue. At higher plasma concentrations, shivering, muscle twitching, tremors, convulsions, central nervous system depression, and coma may result. Respiratory depression and cardiac arrest can also occur with higher doses. Marcaine is rapidly absorbed, poorly reversed, and has a long half-life, making it a less suitable agent for subcutaneous infiltration in liposuction procedures.

Epinephrine is a critical additive in the infiltrate solution. It is recommended that doses of epinephrine not exceed 0.07 mg/kg, although doses as high as 10 mg/kg have been used safely.

Moderate sedation or analgesia, termed conscious sedation, is defined as purposeful responsiveness, with response to verbal or tactile stimulation evident. No airway intervention is required; however, supplemental oxygen may be administered as indicated. Patients demonstrate adequate spontaneous ventilation, with maintenance of cardiovascular function. Although numerous agents can be administered to achieve this level of sedation, it is imperative that the physician be adequately trained in anesthetic medications and airway management if intravenous sedation is planned without the presence of an anesthesia professional. In limited, smaller volume liposuction cases, intravenous sedation may be administered to maintain patient comfort.

In general anesthesia, the patient is unarousable, even with repeated painful stimulation, and independent ventilatory function is often impaired. Patients often require assistance in maintaining a patent airway, and positive-pressure ventilation may be required because of depressed spontaneous ventilation or drug-induced depression of neuromuscular function. As with any surgical procedure, medication is titrated to effect, and a certified anesthetic provider is present for any procedure under general anesthesia.

The physician is primarily responsible for providing and supervising anesthesia and analgesia. A certified registered nurse anesthetist or other qualified health care provider may administer anesthesia, but only under direct physician supervision, unless state law specifically provides otherwise. Dr Koo has a core staff that she works with that is completely trained and familiar with her methods, techniques, and preferences and only that staff is allowed in her operating room. Dr Koo and all operating room and key facility personnel are fully trained to recognize emergencies and complications.

The dry technique was the first method developed. It was performed under general anesthesia without the infiltration of subcutaneous solutions before insertion of the liposuction cannula. Substantial swelling and discoloration is a common consequence of the dry technique. This technique is also associated with a large amount of blood loss, with suction aspirate consisting of 20 to 45 percent blood. These sequelae sharply limited the amount of fat that could be removed without transfusion or hospitalization, which resulted in the abandonment of this approach, except in limited applications. The dry technique is not recommended for suction volumes greater than 1000 ml because of the amount of blood loss incurred. The dry technique should never be used in conjunction with ultrasound-assisted liposuction.

The wet technique entails injecting 200 to 300 ml of infiltrate or wetting solution, with or without additives, into the operative field before insertion of the liposuction cannula. Small doses of the vasoconstrictor epinephrine were added to the infiltrate, which significantly decreased the blood loss to 4 to 30 percent of the aspirate. The wet technique was the method of choice in the early 1980s.

The superwet technique, developed in the mid-1980s, uses 1 ml of solution for each 1 ml of fat to be removed. The surgeon’s preoperative estimate of the suction aspirate is considered in this technique. The infiltrate solution consists of saline or lactated Ringer’s solution with epinephrine and, in some cases, lidocaine. Using larger volumes of subcutaneous infiltrate, blood loss generally decreases to less than 1 percent of the aspirate volume.

The tumescent technique was introduced in 1985. It uses the largest volume of infiltrate and involves infusing 3 to 4 ml of the infiltrate solution for each planned milliliter of aspirate. Drug concentrations in the tumescent infiltrate solution vary, but typically they consist of a range of 0.025% to 0.1% lidocaine and epinephrine 1:1,000,000 in a lactated Ringer’s or normal saline solution. Estimated blood loss with the tumescent technique is approximately 1 percent of the aspirate, comparable to the superwet technique.

Since the advent of epinephrine-containing wetting solutions and sophisticated fluid management techniques, increasingly larger volumes of liposuction aspiration have been reported. Large-volume liposuction, defined as a total aspirate of 5000 ml or greater, can be a safe and effective procedure when patients are carefully selected and when anesthetic and surgical techniques are properly performed. Meticulous fluid balance calculations are necessary to avoid volume abnormalities, as metabolic alterations and fluid shifts result from medication effect, hypodermoclysis, and surgical technique. General practice guidelines recommend overnight observation postoperatively for patients undergoing large-volume liposuction.

Dr Koo is very precise and accurate with the preoperative marking and discusses the areas of liposuction during the preoperative consultation several times prior to the surgery and again on the day of surgery to ensure that the patient understands completely the areas to be contoured and they coincide with the areas of concern for the patient. This is essential to satisfactory results. Patients are marked with a fiber-tip marking pen in the upright position or standing. Areas to be avoided, such as the zones of adherence, is noted carefully.

Dr Michele Koo uses multiple-access incisions for almost all areas because removing all fat from a single access incision may lead to depressions around the access site and contour deformity. Incisions are placed in natural skin folds and asymmetrically to limit visibility of the resultant scars.

Dr Koo places the patient in the appropriate position for access to the treatment site. If multiple areas are to be treated during a single operation, it is convenient to prepare the patient circumferentially so that all areas of the trunk and extremities may be treated without repeated preparation and repositioning. Dr Koo feels that she is able to achieve the most optimal results with circumferential liposuction along with the tummy tuck (abdominoplasty) repositions the patient intraoperatively to better treat and evaluate surgical progress and symmetry.

A thorough operative record includes documentation of each stage of the liposuction procedure. The infiltration solution mixture should be documented and the volume of subcutaneous infiltrate used should be noted as well. Oftentimes, surgeons will note the amount of infiltrate and volume of aspirate by body area and record the total volumes for the entire procedure. This information, along with intravenous fluid administration and monitoring of vital signs and urine output, are important factors for maintaining adequate fluid management intraoperatively and postoperatively. A diligent fluid management strategy between the surgeon and anesthesia provider is important for avoiding volume overload sequelae.

Sequential compression devices should be in place before a general anesthetic is used in most liposuction procedures. Patients who undergo other types of anesthesia or minor procedures may do so without sequential compression devices.

The use of postoperative compression for 6 weeks is usually indicated after liposuction procedures to minimize edema and support the soft tissues. The various compression modalities and garments available for each area can be extremely useful but must be tailored to the area of treatment. The use of a foam material underneath the compression garment to increase compression and protect areas of irritation is frequently beneficial.

No single liposuction technique is best suited for all patients in all circumstances. Factors such as the patient’s overall health, body mass index, the estimated volume of aspirate to be removed, the number of sites to be addressed, and any other concomitant procedures to be performed should be considered by the surgeon to determine the best technique for the individual patient.

Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Introduced in the late 1980s, ultrasound-assisted liposuction uses a cannula or probe to deliver fat-liquefying ultrasound subcutaneously. This technique permits the removal of fat from fibrous areas such as the upper abdomen, back, and flanks with greater ease, especially during secondary procedures. To prevent thermal injuries while performing ultrasound-assisted liposuction, two technique rules are of critical importance. First, the ultrasound probe or cannula must be kept in motion. Second, the infiltrate solution is a required component of ultrasound-assisted liposuction because it plays a crucial role in the process of fat emulsification and cooling the heat generated in the process. The dry technique should never be used in ultrasound-assisted liposuction, regardless of the planned volume of aspirate.

Suction-assisted lipoplasty. Suction-assisted lipoplasty is the most commonly performed aesthetic procedure in the United States. Suction-assisted lipoplasty procedures use an external source of suction to facilitate the removal of fatty tissue.

Power-assisted lipoplasty. Power-assisted lipoplasty is an approach in which the system that drives the cannula is a power source other than the surgeon’s arm. Systems are either electrically driven or gas-driven by nitrogen or compressed air tanks. A small motor moves the 2- to 4-mm cannula tip in a forward and backward motion, replicating the motion of the surgeon and decreasing physician fatigue. The cannulas are small and flexible and are comparable in length and diameter to standard suction-assisted liposuction cannulas. Power-assisted liposuction is effective for large-volume removals, fibrous areas, and revisions. It is typically used in conjunction with the tumescent or superwet technique. The excessive vibration of the cannula and the noise of the power system are the two main disadvantages of this technique.

Combination ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty and suction-assisted lipoplasty. A combination of techniques may be used for treatment of various areas of lipodystrophy.

Other. Syringe aspiration of fat has been used for addressing superficial irregularities independently or in conjunction with another liposuction modality. This method for aspiration may result in less blood loss and has been reported to be a more precise and accurate mode of fat removal. The main disadvantage of syringe aspiration is prolonged operating time. This technique is effective for sensitive and smaller volume areas, such as the neck. It also is commonly used for harvesting fat for transfer, as less mechanical damage to the fat cells allows for a greater percentage of viable cells for transfer.

Embolism may occur from fat or venous thrombosis. The signs of pulmonary embolism may be shortness of breath or difficulty breathing. Deep venous thrombosis may be present with calf or leg pain, Homan’s sign, swelling or erythema of the lower extremity, persistent tachycardia, and/ or mild pyrexia. The thrombus is not usually palpable. Treatment of deep venous thrombosis may entail anticoagulation or placement of a venous filter. Patients who develop a pulmonary embolus may undergo thrombectomy or thrombolysis as well. Although the exact pathophysiology of fat embolism syndrome remains somewhat controversial, signs or symptoms of fat emboli after liposuction require emergency medical care, as permanent disability or fatality may result.

Advances in the understanding of fluid management in the care of the patient undergoing liposuction has increased the margin of safety of this procedure. Firm guidelines for the appropriate amount of fluid resuscitation have yet to be established; however, there are multiple formulas and fluid balance calculations for determining the appropriate balance of intravenous fluid administration and subcutaneous infiltration. The key to appropriate perioperative fluid homeostasis is proper patient selection and consistent communication between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist with regard to perioperative fluid replacement and urine output. The surgeon should be cognizant of all fluid administered and removed with aspirate and excreted as urine output to avoid problems with hypovolemia or fluid overload.

Fatal complications secondary to liposuction may be attributed to anesthetic cardiopulmonary complications, necrotizing fasciitis with overwhelming infection, hypovolemic shock, fat embolism, pulmonary embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, or intraperitoneal and bowel perforation. Less common reports of death resulting from liposuction procedures have also included toxic shock syndrome, acute respiratory distress, and hypersensitivity to medications or instruments used during the procedure.

Intestinal or organ perforation from the liposuction cannula, though rare, usually occurs with a preexisting abdominal scar. The abdomen, thorax, retroperitoneum, and major vessels in the subcutaneous space are all potential areas into which a cannula can be misdirected and potentially result in major injury. Kidney perforation has been reported. Symptoms of organ perforation may not become apparent for several days. When internal organs are violated, patients may present for follow-up with symptoms of an acute abdomen, and an emergent laparotomy may be indicated to assess the extent of damage and to repair injury, as visceral perforations and their associated infections may be fatal. Gentle technique and awareness of the possibility of misdirection of the cannula in the presence of a scar will prevent this complication.

The total blood loss involved in suction-assisted lipectomy is principally dependent on (1) the amount of blood present in each milliliter of aspirate and (2) the absolute amount of aspirate. Total blood loss can be estimated as the percentage of blood in the aspirate multiplied by the total amount suctioned. Clinically, the blood loss is rarely a limiting or significant factor in cases in which total aspirate is less than 1000 ml, regardless of the infiltration method used. The dry technique results in a suction aspirate containing 20 to 45 percent blood.

Any of the complications described in the previous section can also occur in the later postoperative period. Surgeons should recognize additional complications that may present as convalescence continues.

Patients with a higher body mass index have been found to have a significantly increased risk for developing postoperative seromas. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction has also been associated with a slightly increased risk of seroma formation. Suggestions for decreasing the incidence of seroma include expressing any remaining fluid before closure; using a single suture to close incisions, allowing for fluid egress; applying a well-fitting compression garment; and encouraging the patient to ambulate soon after surgery. Simple aspiration is the most common treatment for a seroma. An implantable catheter or drain can be used to avoid repeated aspiration.

Although large areas of skin loss is rare, ulceration or friction injury is more commonly noted at the entrance site from incorrect use of the cannula, tension on skin margins, or an incision that is too small for the instruments used. Burns have also been associated with ultrasound-assisted liposuction, as the ultrasound cannula can become very hot, and prolonged contact with the skin may result in skin damage.

Infections can occur and have been known to progress to serious and life-threatening conditions if not appropriately attended to. Many surgeons will prescribe perioperative antibiotics to minimize the risk of infection. Physicians who perform liposuction should be familiar with the signs and symptoms of conditions such as toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis.

The most common postoperative sequelae of liposuction are contour irregularities; these may be considered complications if they persist for over 6 months. Because contour irregularities may be secondary to postoperative swelling and skin elasticity, they may be treated conservatively for at least 6 months after the initial operation. However, for areas of excessive fat removal or insufficient fat removal, secondary liposuction, fat grafting, and dermolipectomy can be considered to address the persistent area(s) of concern. Nonsurgical treatments for early contour irregularities include manual lymphatic massage and Endermologie (LPG Systems, Valence, France). Long-term swelling may be noted in a small number of liposuction patients.

Skin hyperpigmentation may be attributed to several factors. Hemosiderin deposition by ecchymosis, external pressure from bandages applied, and possible friction from the inlet holes of the cannula have been suspected of increasing the likelihood of hyperpigmentation postoperatively. Several areas are known to be prone to hyperpigmentation (e.g., the medial thigh). This effect is more often attributed to ultrasound-assisted liposuction and extended treatment time to a single area (>10 minutes). Patients should also be cautioned that oral iron therapy, exogenous drug administration (particularly estrogen), and sun exposure may contribute to the development of hyperpigmentation after liposuction.

Patients may experience paresthesias after surgery. Patients have reported hypersensitivity and numbness after surgery that may persist for weeks or months. In a small number of patients, these paresthesias may be permanent.

The analysis of the sequelae of liposuction and tummy tucks does not provide specific percentages of complications associated with liposuction. Seromas, infection, and tissue irregularities are the most common minor problems. Deep venous thrombosis, associated with pulmonary embolism and death, is the most frequent serious complication of liposuction. Thus, the prevention and, if necessary, the expeditious diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis are integral to the care of the liposuction patient.

Dr Koo examines patients who may desire secondary surgery to correct contour irregularities carefully and counsels them to ascertain their realistic goals for surgery. Previous surgical procedures are considered and careful notation is made to document the site of secondary surgery and the anticipated amount of secondary lipoaspirate or augmentation with dermal fat grafts of lipotransfer. Skin resection may be necessary for areas of inadequate skin retraction.

Physical outcome and ease of recovery are not the only factors that define patient and physician satisfaction, as successful body contouring surgery requires a patient to embrace positive lifestyle habits. Dr Koo recognizes the importance of patient education on postoperative alternatives in diet and exercise and will help the patient establish a connection with nutritionists as well as exercise trainers. This will ultimately help the patient maintain successes achieved with the liposuction and tummy tuck procedures.

Dr Michele Koo always maintains a relationship with her patients seeing them post operatively indefinitely thereby making sure that they “check in” for annual breast examinations as well as keeping track of their weight and exercise maintenance. Dr Koo wants to change and enhance the patients life and lifestyle and continues to take care of her patients years after any procedures at no further follow-up charges.

The War on Wrinkles and What Plastic Surgeons are Discovering.

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

Dr Koo wants you to know that research is continually being conducted for the safety and discovery of new products that help reduce wrinkles and maintain healthy skin. The following is the continuation of the her blog with the study by Dr Mary Lupo.

Because of the differences in appearance between the two products, each study site had two investigators: a treating investigator who was not blinded and an evaluating investigator who was. To maintain this blinding, the evaluating investigator was not present during treatment. In addition, the subjects were blindfolded during their treatments to ensure that they too were blinded as to treatment type in each nasolabial fold. The treating investigator injected the appropriate amount of product necessary to achieve full correction but did not overcorrect. Up to two touch-up treatments were allowed. The evaluating investigator assessed the level of correction at 2 and 4 weeks after the initial treatment and, if less than optimal, the treating investigator performed the touch-up with the same assigned filler(s).

Every 4 weeks for up to 24 weeks after the last treatment, subjects were followed for assessment of nasolabial fold severity. The evaluating and treating investigators used the validated, static, five-point Wrinkle Assessment Scale with a photographic guide to score the folds as 0 (none), no wrinkle; 1 (mild), shallow, just perceptible wrinkle; 2 (moderate), moderately deep wrinkle; 3 (severe), deep wrinkle, well-defined edges but not overlapping; or 4 (extreme) very deep wrinkle, redundant fold, overlapping skin. Subjects also performed a self-assessment at each visit using the same five-point Wrinkle Assessment Scale but without photographs. At study end while still blinded to treatment assignment, subjects were asked which filler, if any, they preferred. Treatment site reactions were reported by subjects through day 13 after each treatment, and any additional adverse events reported by the subjects or observed by the investigators were also recorded.

At completion of the 24-week study, subjects were offered the opportunity to return at their convenience for a complimentary repeated treatment with the filler of their choice, and an additional effectiveness assessment was performed just before this treatment. At a subset of investigational sites, an extended follow-up study was initiated to assess injection volume and longevity of correction for repeated treatment. Because this post-24-week period was not blinded, all assessments were performed by the treating investigators, whose evaluations during the pivotal study mirrored those of the evaluating investigators. Follow-up visits for effectiveness assessments after repeated treatment occurred at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after repeated treatment, and an amendment to the extended study protocol allowed even further evaluations at 36 and 48 weeks after repeated treatment. The protocols and amendments for both studies were approved by the applicable institutional review boards, and subjects provided written informed consent for each study in which they participated.

Continued on Next Blog

What? Do it yourself Plastic Surgery Procedures…Don’t discount your Parachute or Plastic Surgeon…

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

You’ve read about Priscilla Presley and Larry King’s wife getting non medical grade silicone injections as well as Kanye West’s Mom…just be careful who you go to and the actual products that are being used or what you purchase. Ask the relevant questions of where the products come from, make sure you know the reputation and qualifications of your plastic surgeon and doctor before allowing anyone to do anything to you.

Many products are available online through pharmacies located in Canada, Switzerland, and India. While the products may be good quality products, the concentrations may vary and you have to reconstitute the products, i.e., put the freeze dried products back into a solution for injection or to be taken by mouth. The amount of dilution is very important and will effect the outcome of the products. You also have to be very careful that the products stay sterile for fear of infection when the product is ingested or injected!

My motto, …don’t discount your parachute, neurosurgeon, or your plastic surgeon…there are some things that are not worth looking for a bargain for…

You must be your own medical advocate and if your plastic surgeon becomes offended at your questions,

This is an online article for Medscape from Jennifer Walden, MD about what the lay persons are doing.

A disturbing news story was reported last week by WBZ TV, out of Dallas, Texas, about a growing trend that doctors have noted regarding lay people performing do-it-yourself cosmetic procedures. A quick Google search on the topic reveals that there are a startling number of reports online about patients injecting themselves with not only FDA-approved products like Botox and hyaluronic acid fillers, but non-medical grade silicone as well. From skincare to laser treatments, and even do-it-yourself Botox instructions and products available online, in a tough economy there seems to be a dangerous new market for plastic surgery products available for direct consumption by the masses. Unqualified injectors making house calls to inject Botox and Dysport as well as filler products like silicone have also been reported, as have spas and salons having these injectables available at reduced rates. With a substance like Botox or Dysport, which is a purified protein derivative of botulinum toxin, taking the DIY route can not only be harmful but in some cases deadly.

As WBZ reported in November 2009, a Texas woman was busted for selling home Botox kits: “Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott says Laurie D’Alleva sold several prescription drugs online from her businesses, Ontario MedSpa and Discount MedSpa. Abbott says D’Alleva doesn’t have a license to sell or distribute prescription products, which is required in Texas. She also apparently produced her own how-to videos showing her injecting her own face with syringes”. Her website has been taken down and she has since been arrested, and her self-injection videos were on YouTube.

Only licensed doctors can legally purchase FDA-approved injectables, and of course injectables should only be injected by one’s treating physician. The doctor must be experienced enough to make sure the right amount of Botox is injected into the appropriate site, and that the fillers are placed in the correct anatomical area for the desired result. All injectables have potential downsides or side-effects which should be disclosed to the patient prior to any injection by an informed consent process. The fillers and toxins also have “off-label” uses as deemed by the FDA.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery have formed The Physicians Coalition for Injectable Safety to publicly address some of the recent dangers for the public seen with injectables. According to consumeraffairs.com:

“The Coalition is cautioning consumers worldwide about the risks of buying cosmetic injectables from online sources. Websites like Amazon.com, e-Bay and Web pharmacies are among just a few of the online resources offering prescription-free Botox, Restylane, or a knock off brand of cosmetic injectables to any buyer.

For products obtained online or bootlegged from other countries, the possibility exists that the product has been obtained illegally, stored improperly or packaged incorrectly. All of these things can lead to poor outcomes including disfigurement, infection or in some cases even death. The Coalition warns that cosmetic injectables require both a diagnosis and prescription by a licensed, qualified physician”.

In conclusion, the outcome of any cosmetic filler or toxin relies on the experience and training of the physician and the brand of the injectable, and licensed medical professionals that are the most qualified to perform these procedures must have the training and understanding of the three-dimensional anatomy of the face that is required for the success of the injections, as well as a detailed knowledge of the filler or toxin to be injected.

What to Tell Your Teenager if they Ask for Plastic Surgery….

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

Clearly this is a very complex and difficult question, and as varied and complicated as every single individual teen that is out there…

As a plastic surgeon and a Mother of 3 young adults, 20, 18, and 15, I have significant professional as well as personal experience with this topic. I am very sensitive about this subject given the fact that my 18 and 15 year olds are young independent headstrong women.

I have so many young teenagers and young adults, boys, and primarily girls that inquire about rhinoplasty and breast and body contouring. Often times, the Mother will bring the patient into my office or if the patient is 18 years or older, they themselves make the appointment, pay the consultation fee and attend the consultation alone or with a friend.

Perhaps more at issue is what is the nature of the plastic surgery inquiry. There are many procedures that truly will enhance the self confidence of the teenager that corrects a genetic predisposition, for example, gynecomastia, in young men.

Some male adolescents develop breasts secondary to rapid weight gain, hormones, and genetics. This can be extremely debilitating for the teenager. He refuses to be seen without a shirt on during PE, any sports activity, and then continues to gain weight thereby worsening the amount of actual breast tissue and fat.

Liposuction for gynecomastia in the young adolescent male can be life changing and extremely uplifting. Breast augmentation for the young adolescent girl, however, absolutely projects a different image. While you could make an argument that liposuction for gynecomastia is a necessity like obesity surgery, you would be hard pressed to say breast augmentation is a necessity because it corrects a genetic abnormality. But truthfully, it does.

So what’s the difference? Again, as a Mother of 2 young adolescent women AND a plastic surgeon, I am always torn as to what is the right answer. The truth is, it is completely dependent on the young woman and her parents if they are paying for it. However, after the age of 18, the young woman has total legal rights to sign her own surgical consent and undergo any procedure. So why am I so torn about the issue of breast implants for a 16 or 17 year old.

So why does it seem so wrong for a 16 or even a 17 year old to ask and want a breast augmentation? First of all, call me naive and ignorant, but I still feel that while they are physically ready to have sex, which is what breast enhancement implies, I think they are still too emotionally immature and do not need yet another complex issue to bring drama and angst into an already too tumultuous life. Yes, of course, the teen may be motivated by lack of confidence and self esteem (which is more perhaps the case when there is severe breast asymmetry) but really the teen is saying I am ready or have already been engaging in sexual activities and now want a breast augmentation.

First of all, the recommendation of the Association of Plastic Surgeons is to wait until the age of 18 for saline implants and the age of 23 for silicone implants. That being said, it is still the decision of the parent to allow this to occur and up to the plastic surgeon to discuss all of the legal and medical risks and implications.

This is when I discuss with the patient and the parent if they are involved, the long term implications of a breast implant, the surgical effect on the breasts, the implications for future mammograms, breast cancer, breast feeding etc, etc, but MOST IMPORTANT of all, I personally assess the emotional stability and psychological maturity of the patient and her relationship with the parents and/or boyfriend.

I then make a recommendation depending on my assessment of the patient, the situation, and what the parent has expressed to me. Oftentimes, the parents have called me first to discuss this consultation prior to the actual surgical consultation and they express their true wishes without their daughter in attendance because they don’t want to say no to the daughter who would then become belligerent, nasty, and relentless. The parents are actually asking me for help to say no to their daughter. The parents want me to guide the daughter into making the decision to wait until she is 18.

I believe that is a reasonable request and I ask the patient to return in 6 months or a year or a set amount of time to discuss the surgery (which I would normally for any patient) but in this case even more important as the passage of time may see the patient turn 18 as well as give her time to think about the surgery and its implications.

My personal advice to parents who are extremely against any plastic surgery for their teen before the age of 18…is you hold the pocket book, you make the decision. More than likely your teenager does not have the resources to pay for the surgery and you have the ultimate power and authority (finacially and legally) so don’t give in until YOU are comfortable with it or until they are 18 and whatever age it is when you feel they are making sound choices.

MORE NEXT BLOG ON TEEN RHINOPLASTY AND LIPOSUCTION


back to the top