Please upgrade to the latest version of Flash Player.

Click here if you already have Flash Player installed.

Please upgrade to the latest version of Flash Player.

Click here if you already have Flash Player installed.

Plastic Surgeon Dr. Michele Koo’s Blog | St. Louis | Kansas City Lip Wrinkles

Posts Tagged ‘Lip Wrinkles’

Your Face Doesn’t Have to Look Wrinkled and Tired…

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Dr Michele Koo, MD, FACS is a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon in St Louis, Missouri who has extensive experience with Juvederm and other fillers to minimize and plump those deep creases on your face. In 30-40 minutes in the office, Dr Koo will be able to fill those deep nasolabial folds, corners of your downturned mouth, and soften your lips to keep you from looking so sad and gaunt.

As we age and try to eat right and maintain our weight, our faces become volume depleted and the lines seem to deepen as the skin begins to lose its elasticity. With BOTOX AND JUVEDERM (FILLER), Dr Koo is able to soften your face and fill those deep crevices of your nasolabial folds and marionette lines of your chin. She can just ever so slightly plump your lips so your face is not so drawn and shrunken. Dr Koo is very subtle and gentle with her application of BOTOX AND JUVEDERM and you will not appear “done” or obvious with your BOTOX AND JUVEDERM. You will look rested and rejuvenated in 30 minutes!!

Dr Koo wants you to understand the safety of JUVEDERM and the following is the continuation of the article by Dr Mary Lupo as it appeared in the Plastic & Reconstructive Journal, January 2008.

Safety
The occurrence of treatment site reactions was similar for Juvéderm Ultra Plus and Zyplast. The majority of individual treatment-site reactions (e.g., erythema, induration, pain, edema, nodule, bruising, pruritus, and discoloration) lasted for no more than 7 days and were mild or moderate in severity, with no intervention required. No hypersensitivity reactions were reported for Juvéderm Ultra Plus, and there were no serious treatment-related adverse events.

Effectiveness
Initial Treatment Period
Although the mean correction after treatment was similar for both products, nasolabial fold severity scores from the treating investigators for the Juvéderm Ultra Plus filler were significantly better (lower) than for Zyplast at each follow-up time point from 4 to 24 weeks (Fig. 1). Over the 24-week period, the scores for Zyplast nearly returned to baseline (mean, 2.5), whereas the Juvéderm Ultra Plus scores remained low (mean, 1.3-equivalent to a mild wrinkle). Not surprisingly, the level of improvement in nasolabial fold severity score for both fillers was greatest at 2 weeks after the last treatment. At 24 weeks, the mean improvement was still 1.7 with the Juvéderm Ultra Plus product but only 0.5 with bovine collagen (Fig. 2). Clinically significant improvement (defined as mean greater than or equal to a one-point improvement relative to baseline) was maintained with Juvéderm Ultra Plus but not with bovine collagen at 24 weeks after optimal correction was achieved. The proportion of nasolabial folds showing significant improvement was consistently high for Juvéderm Ultra Plus (≥96 percent) but not so with collagen (41 percent at 24 weeks). Furthermore, 67 percent of the Juvéderm nasolabial folds had at least a two-point improvement at this 6-month visit (Fig. 3). Subject assessments of effectiveness were similar to those of the investigators. An overwhelming majority of subjects preferred Juvéderm Ultra Plus (85 percent) versus collagen (10 percent) or no preference (5 percent).

Among the subjects who returned at 1 year or beyond, assessments just before repeated treatment showed that 81 percent of subjects with severe nasolabial folds at baseline who were treated with Juvéderm Ultra Plus had maintained at least a one-point improvement in nasolabial fold severity and that 38 percent had at least a two-point improvement (Fig. 3), with a mean improvement of 1.3.

Repeated Treatment Period
The volume of Juvéderm Ultra Plus required to achieve optimal correction was significantly less at repeated treatment than at initial treatment. The median volume of Juvéderm Ultra Plus injected at initial treatment was two syringes (1.6 ml), and at repeated treatment 6 to 9 months later it was less than one syringe (0.7 ml).

Trends in Wrinkle Assessment Scale scores for the subset of subjects who were followed up to 48 weeks after their repeated treatments mirrored those observed in the initial study period. Although the sample size was small at 48 weeks, clinically significant mean improvement was still observed for Juvéderm Ultra Plus (Fig. 4), and 88 percent of the severe nasolabial folds treated with Juvéderm Ultra Plus in the original study and at repeated treatment still had a clinically significant correction at 1 year after repeated treatment despite the significantly lower injection volume at repeated treatment.

Continued in Next Blog

JUVEDERM THE MIRACLE FACIAL WRINKLE FILLER - Hyaluronic Acid What?

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

DR MICHELE KOO, MD, FACS, BOARD CERTIFIED PLASTIC SURGEON, ST LOUIS, MISSOURI wants you to know that JUVEDERM and BOTOX are an extremely safe, economical way with no down time to soften your face in a significant way by smoothing and filling in the facial wrinkles that make you look tired and older than you are. Why always be asked if you are mad or tired? Take charge of your life and in 30 minutes in Dr Koo’s office rejuvenate your face with JUVEDERM AND BOTOX to lift up the frowns around your mouth, ever so subtlely plump your lips, and fill in those deep nasolabial folds.

Dr Koo wants you to know that JUVEDERM AND BOTOX are extremely safe and has been FDA approved for facial use to fill creases and smooth the dynamic lines of your face around the eyes and forehead.

The following is a continuation of an article by Dr Mary Lupo, published in the Plastic & Reconstructive Journal, January 2008. Dr Koo hopes that this is helpful information to let you understand the fillers that are available and to realize that the fillers are very safe.

One small open-label study in France treated 49 subjects with Juvéderm 30 in either one or two of four possible injection sites, the nasolabial folds (59 percent), upper lip (37 percent), glabella (16 percent), and bitterness folds (10 percent).4 Most subjects had a touch-up at 1 to 2 months after treatment, with a mean of 0.6 ml administered at each session. Wrinkle severity improvement of approximately 50 percent on a five-point scale remained stable up to 11 months after initial treatment.
Interestingly, in our study, the nasolabial folds initially treated with Zyplast returned almost to baseline after the initial 24-week period, but subsequent treatment with Juvéderm Ultra Plus resulted in the same duration of clinically significant improvement as seen in the nasolabial folds originally treated with Juvéderm Ultra Plus.

The most significant finding from our studies is the extended duration of correction for Juvéderm Ultra Plus, in particular, for severe folds. Other resorbable fillers (collagens and hyaluronic acids) have not been proven to last beyond 6 months. The most comparable product, Perlane, was developed to treat deeper folds in that it is indicated for injection into the deep dermis and has larger hyaluronic acid gel particles than its sister product Restylane, both from Medicis Aesthetics (Scottsdale, Ariz.).5 Juvéderm has a different manufacturing process that creates a homogenous gel without a granular consistency.

In a split-face study comparing Perlane to Zyplast in 68 subjects with a range of different wrinkle severities from mild to extreme, 26 percent were classified as having severe nasolabial folds before treatment, although results were not stratified by baseline nasolabial fold severity.6 At 6 months after optimal correction, 59 percent of all Perlane-treated folds maintained correction, as opposed to the 96 percent noted in the Juvéderm Ultra Plus severe folds study. Moreover, at 9 months, only 49 percent of the Perlane folds were rated as superior to Zyplast, with 37 percent showing equivalency between Perlane and Zyplast and 14 percent showing Zyplast to be superior to Perlane.

Given that Juvéderm Ultra Plus outlasts the temporary dermal fillers, perhaps it should be compared with the semipermanent fillers Radiesse (BioForm Medical, San Mateo, Calif.) and Sculptra (Dermik Aesthetics, Berwyn, Pa.). Radiesse consists of synthetic calcium hydroxylapatite microspheres suspended in a gel of glycerin, water, and sodium carboxymethylcellulose.7 Following injection, the gel dissipates, collagen production is stimulated for volumizing, and phagocytosis gradually breaks down and eliminates the microspheres.

In December of 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Radiesse for correction of moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds and for facial lipoatrophy in people with human immunodeficiency virus,8 although the product had earlier been approved for other uses such as vocal cord augmentation and was used off-label, particularly for deep creases such as severe nasolabial folds.9 The pivotal trial involved 117 subjects treated with Radiesse in one nasolabial fold and human collagen in the other nasolabial fold with up to two touch-ups allowed at 2-week intervals to attain optimal correction (mean Radiesse injection volume, 1.2 ml).8 Rated on a six-point scale using blinded photographic assessments, the mean improvement in wrinkle severity at 6 months was 1.3 (compared with 1.7 on a five-point scale for Juvéderm Ultra Plus at the same time point), and no long-term data were provided.

In a small open-label study, patient self-reports showed duration of nasolabial fold correction of 10 to 12 months for four of 18 subjects and greater than 12 months for 14 of 18 subjects.10 Another open-label study was based on surveys sent to 609 subjects who had received Radiesse injections to the nasolabial folds or other facial areas.11 Responses to the 6-month survey were received from 155 subjects, and responses to an additional survey sent between 12 and 24 months after initial treatment were received from 112 subjects. Average subject satisfaction at 6 months was 3.9 on a five-point scale (with 5 being most satisfied). In the 12- to 24-month survey, 69 percent reported satisfaction, although the most common comment was thought it would last longer. Importantly, 84 percent of subjects (n = 512) required repeated treatments to achieve or maintain optimal correction. Of those, 63 percent had touch-ups at 4 to 6 weeks and 53 percent at 5 to 9 months.

Sculptra is an injectable poly-L-lactic acid indicated for correction of lipoatrophy though, like Radiesse, it is used off-label for cosmetic wrinkle correction and volumizing. The product must be reconstituted with water at least 2 hours before injection, and the correction fades within 1 week as the fluid is absorbed. The mechanism of action is the stimulation of collagen production, which requires several injections at intervals of at least 2 weeks to generate cosmetic improvement.12 Clinical studies on Sculptra have focused on human immunodeficiency virus-positive subjects with facial lipoatrophy13; thus, the longevity of correction in facial wrinkles is unknown.

One salient point about the semipermanent fillers is that they are generally injected through larger needles than used with collagen or hyaluronic acid-based fillers to prevent the particles in the product from clogging the needle. A 25-gauge needle is preferred for Sculptra,14 and a 25- to 27-gauge needle is recommended for Radiesse,15 with a larger needle having greater propensity to generate tissue trauma and pain on injection. In contrast, Juvéderm Ultra Plus is injected through a smaller 27-gauge needle.2 Moreover, Radiesse and Sculptra are intended for placement only in the deep dermis or dermal-subcutaneous junction and do not have the flexibility to treat finer wrinkles and folds, as can Juvéderm Ultra Plus.

CONCLUSIONS
Juvéderm Ultra Plus represents an excellent combination of attributes for a dermal filler. Permanent products bear some long-term risk if the initial correction is excessive or misapplied and can result in an unnatural appearance as aging tissues shrink and make the filler visible.16 Semipermanent fillers, in contrast, are prone to the problems endemic to the particulate nature of these products, may require larger needle sizes, and have limited utility in superficial defects or wrinkles. Juvéderm Ultra Plus may have found the sweet spot of an ideal duration for wrinkle correction with a good safety profile.

BOTOX - But I don’t want my face frozen…

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

DR MICHELE KOO, MD, FACS, BOARD CERTIFIED PLASTIC SURGEON, ST LOUIS, MISSOURI wants you to have to latest information of the research on BOTOX AND JUVEDERM. This is the continuation of the article by Dr Mary Lupo published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal, January 2008.

Dr Koo stays ahead of the learning curve and constantly re-evaluates the products available to you as well as her own results to give you the best and newest most optimal treatments. Furthermore, she performs all of the treatments herself and follows you very closely so as to tailor all future treatments for you so they will be as perfect as possible for your skin and face. Dr Koo believes in custom tailoring your treatment. She is respecful of your budget and time and will discuss all the options available to you for smoothing the wrinkles on your face and softening the years away with filler.

This continues the article on Juvederm by Dr Mary Lupo as published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery January 2008.

Subjects in the subset with severe nasolabial folds (Wrinkle Assessment Scale grade 3) were included if they had fully visible bilateral nasolabial folds that were severe at the deepest part (as assessed by the evaluating investigator) and were approximately symmetrical and of equal severity on each facial side. Exclusion criteria included hypersensitivity to bovine collagen or hyaluronic acid; history of atopy, anaphylaxis, multiple severe allergies, or allergy to meat or lidocaine; current immune therapy or history of autoimmune disease; tendency to develop hypertrophic scarring; use of oral retinoids or, in the nasolabial fold area, over-the-counter or prescription antiwrinkle treatments, microdermabrasion, or chemical peels in the 4 weeks before randomization; and any cosmetic procedure or tissue augmentation at the nasolabial folds in the 6 months before study entry.

Subjects were eligible to enroll in the repeated treatment study if they completed the initial 24-week period, indicated at the final visit that the Juvéderm-treated side was preferred, and the repeated treatment was performed between 24 and 36 weeks (±14 days) after initial optimal correction was achieved in the pivotal study. The main exclusion criteria included facial hair that would interfere with the visual assessments of nasolabial fold severity and having undergone or having plans to undergo any tissue augmentation with temporary, permanent, or semipermanent dermal fillers; botulinum toxin injection; laser resurfacing; dermabrasion; chemical peel; or face lift in the lower two-thirds of the face less than 30 days before the repeated treatment or at any time thereafter through the end of the extended follow-up period. Eligible subjects underwent their repeated treatment to both nasolabial folds on the same day with the same Juvéderm formulation that was used during the pivotal study treatment.

Statistical analysis was performed on the intent-to-treat population for effectiveness data and on the as-treated population for safety data. A value of p < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. The improvements in nasolabial fold severity score were compared with baseline using a signed rank test, and the proportion of nasolabial folds with a clinically significant improvement (one or more point decrease on the five-point scale compared with baseline) was evaluated using a McNemar test. Mean nasolabial fold severity scores were compared against the control by means of generalized estimating equations analyses.

RESULTS
Subjects
The initial study enrolled 439 subjects through 11 investigational sites across the United States. A total of 87 subjects with severe nasolabial folds (both nasolabial folds rated as a 3 on the five-point scale) were randomized to treatment with Juvéderm Ultra Plus in one nasolabial fold and Zyplast in the opposite nasolabial fold. Nearly all [n = 82 (94 percent)] of the subjects completed the 24-week follow-up period and most [n = 70 (81 percent)] of the subjects returned for the complimentary repeated treatment. Because of varying circumstances (e.g., scheduling issues, Hurricane Katrina), a small number of subjects (n = 16) had effectiveness evaluations 1 year or more after their last study treatment (before any repeated treatment). These subjects were statistically similar to the other study subjects in terms of injection volume and nasolabial fold severity at 6 months. Thus, these subjects’ long-term results (i.e., effectiveness at 1 year or more) can be extrapolated to the overall population.

Demographic data revealed that most subjects were female Caucasians with a mean age of 49 years (range, 26 to 74 years). The full range of Fitzpatrick skin types was represented, and 36 percent of subjects had darker skin types (Fitzpatrick types IV through VI).

Five of the original 11 sites participated in the repeated treatment study, enrolling 17 subjects from the Juvéderm Ultra Plus severe fold baseline cohort, all of whom completed the originally planned 24-week follow-up period after repeated treatment. Although the 48-week time point had already passed for a number of these subjects before the protocol amendment extending the study, eight subjects enrolled and received an effectiveness assessment at 48 weeks. Demographic details for those subjects participating in the repeated treatment study were similar to the original study.

Continued on Next Blog

What is a good age to start BOTOX and filler, is 25 too early, 65 too late?

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

The advantage of something like BOTOX and Juvederm is that it only takes 20-30 minutes in your plastic surgeon’s office. The disadvantage of course is the cost and you must maintain the BOTOX every 3-5 months and the filler every 12-18 months. However, if you start BOTOX before the lines and creases become deep and relatively permanent, your skin will stay quite a bit more smooth and youthful appearing as you age.

The animation muscles of your face have worked all of your life, your skin is much more resilient during the first 25 years and therefore you see no lines and creases. As you incur sun damage along with age, your skin begins to show the results of that muscle action and sun exposure as well as exposure to toxins such as nicotine from cigarettes if you are a smoker.

It is better to start with the BOTOX in the mid to late 20’s to prevent the deep creases from ever beginning. There really is no age limit on the other end except that the BOTOX and fillers are not as effective if there are so many creases and they are so deep. Same thing for the fillers in that you will need so much more filler if your wrinkles are extremely deep and you in fact may need to have the skin redraped with surgery in addition to the filler to regain softness and volume to your face.

The following exerpt continues the information from the study by Dr Mary Lupo published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2008. Dr Michele Koo hopes that this is helpful and that you understand that outcomes and effects are continually being studied and monitored by plastic surgeons throughout the country to ensure the safety of the products we use for WRINKLE REDUCTION.

Dr Koo is extremely respectful of your time and money and will only use what she feels is the best product for you and will not use any more than you need to address your concerns. She truly believes that often, “less is more” and that subtlety is the key to looking better without looking done.  Why should anyone know what your secret is. Dr Koo will be your best kept secret on the War Against Wrinkles.

With the baby boomer generation firmly ensconced in middle age, there is increasing interest in maintaining a youthful appearance to match this energetic generation. After the 2002 U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of botulinum toxin type A (Botox Cosmetic; Allergan, Inc., Santa Barbara, Calif.) for treatment of glabellar lines, nonsurgical correction of wrinkles became a possibility. With Botox management of dynamic wrinkles, a plethora of new dermal fillers are vying to address static wrinkles, providing an overall rejuvenation of the aging face.

Among these promising new treatments is the family of Juvéderm hyaluronic acid dermal fillers (Allergan), approved in the United States in 2006 for treatment of facial wrinkles and folds. Juvéderm Ultra Plus Injectable Gel has a high degree of cross-linking, which makes it particularly well suited for volumizing and correcting deeper folds and wrinkles.2 Patients with deep facial wrinkles and folds are generally at a disadvantage when it comes to cosmetic correction, as they require a large volume of dermal filler and their correction may not be sustained; thus, a filler that is specifically designed to treat severe wrinkles is an important advancement.

Results from the randomized, controlled study of three Juvéderm formulations compared with bovine collagen have been published previously.3 We sought to further characterize the clinical characteristics of Juvéderm Ultra Plus treatment (and to compare this to bovine collagen treatment) among subjects who had severe nasolabial folds before treatment.

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, within-subject, controlled study was conducted as part of a submission for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This study compared three different formulations of Juvéderm against bovine collagen (Zyplast; Allergan). One-third of subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with Juvéderm Ultra Plus, containing 24 mg/ml of cross-linked hyaluronic acid, in one nasolabial fold and Zyplast in the other. Results presented here are limited to those subjects who received Juvéderm Ultra Plus and had severe folds at baseline.

Blog to be Continued in What age is good to start BOTOX…

The True Facts about BOTOX…

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

DR MICHELE KOO, MD, FACS, BOARD CERTIFIED PLASTIC SURGEON, ST LOUIS, MISSOURI 314-984-8331 WANTS YOU TO KNOW THAT BOTOX INJECTIONS FOR FACIAL LINES AND WRINKLES ARE EXTREMELY SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE LINES OF YOUR FOREHEAD, “11″ WRINKLES BETWEEN YOUR EYEBROWS, YOUR CROWS FEET, OR YOUR “SMOKERS WRINKLES” AROUND YOUR MOUTH, YOU NEED TO CALL DR KOO AT 314-984-8331 AND SEE FOR YOURSELF IN 30 MINUTES WHAT YOU CAN AFFORDABLY ACHIEVE WITH NO DOWN TIME.

DR KOO IS EXTREMELY PRECISE ABOUT WHICH MUSCLES SHE INJECTS AND CAREFUL NOT TO USE ANY MORE THAN NECESSARY SAVING YOU COST AND MINIMIZING YOUR POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS. IF YOU THOUGHT ALL THOSE MEDIA PERSONALITIES HAVE PERFECT FLAWLESS SKIN WITHOUT WRINKLES BECAUSE OF THEIR GENETICS OR GOOD LUCK, THINK AGAIN. THEY ALL HAVE THEIR FAVORITE PLASTIC SURGEONS, AND DR KOO WANTS TO BE YOURS.

THE FOLLOWING IS AN ARTICLE THAT SHE HOPES IS HELPFUL FOR YOUR EDUCATION ABOUT BOTOX AND ITS POSSIBILITIES OF SMOOTHING YOUR FACE WITHOUT SURGERY.

BOTOX (R) Injections to Improve Facial Aesthetics

Author: Pramit S Malhotra, MD, MS, Director, Malhotra Center for Plastic Surgery, PC
Coauthor(s): Daniel G Danahey, MD, PhD, Consulting Staff, Michiana Eye Center and Facial Plastic Surgery; Peter Hilger, MD, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota Medical School

Introduction

History

Botulinum toxin is best known to clinicians as a deadly poison produced by the Clostridium botulinum bacterium. Only within the past 2 decades have clinical applications for this toxin surfaced. Originally, applicability was found for botulinum toxin in the treatment of strabismus; however, this single indication has now grown into many. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved botulinum toxin A for blepharospasm, strabismus, cervical dystonia, and the aesthetic improvement of glabellar rhytides.

Common clinical uses

Currently, botulinum toxin is most commonly used in the management of hyperfunctional lines. Previously, hyperfunctional lines were the source of much consternation for those affected by them. These lines often caused patients to be misinterpreted as angry, anxious, fearful, or fatigued. In the past, plastic surgeons only had surgical options in their armamentarium, including excision or implantation of fat, collagen, or silicone. These procedures often provided minimal improvement and exposed patients to the risks associated with surgery. Injections of botulinum toxin A provide an opportunity to manage these hyperfunctional lines with minimal morbidity. The 3 most common sites for injection are the glabella, periorbital crow’s feet, and forehead areas.

Pathophysiology

Etiology of hyperfunctional lines

Hyperfunctional lines result from the contraction of the underlying facial musculature. The forehead is a complex of the frontalis muscle with insertions onto fibers of the procerus, corrugator, depressor supercilii, and orbicularis muscles. The frontalis muscle, responsible for the surprised appearance when acting unopposed, mediates elevation of the brow and is primarily responsible for horizontal wrinkles. Soft tissue laxity of the forehead and periorbital area causes brow ptosis and reflex contraction of the frontalis muscle to restore brow position, exacerbating forehead rhytides. Treatment of these rhytides with BOTOX® can increase brow ptosis.

The frontalis muscle can also be responsible for the appearance of scowling. However, the main agent responsible for the appearance of scowling is the corrugator muscle. The normal function of the corrugator is as a brow adductor, bringing the eyebrow medial and inferior. Chronic contraction of the corrugator results in deep vertical hyperfunctional lines between the eyes, sometimes referred to as a glabellar crease. The depressor supercilii muscle pulls the medial brow inferior and medially. The last muscle in this group is the procerus muscle, which overlies the nasal root. Contraction of the procerus results in a snout-nose appearance and a horizontal rhytid at the nasal root.

The anatomy of hyperfunctional lines in the orbit is intricate. Contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle is primarily responsible for the clinically observed periorbital crow’s feet. The orbicularis oculi muscle is bordered superolaterally by fibers of the frontalis muscle and medially by the levator palpebrae muscle. Injection of this area requires special cognizance of adjacent musculature to avoid upper lid ptosis.

Pharmacology

The Clostridium botulinum bacterium produces 7 distinct toxins lettered A through G. All 7 toxins are antigenically distinct; however, toxin A is most familiar to clinicians. Botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) causes paralysis by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. This is accomplished in 3 steps. First, the toxin binds the nerve. Second, the toxin is internalized into the nerve. Third, the toxin is cleaved by internal proteolytic enzymes, and the degradation byproducts interfere with the normal process of vesicle fusion to the plasma membrane. This results in the inhibition of the exocytosis of acetylcholine.

The toxin requires 24-72 hours to take effect, reflecting the time necessary to disrupt the synaptosomal process. In very rare circumstances, some individuals may require as many as 5 days for the full effect to be observed. The dose of the toxin is measured as 1 standard unit, which is equal to the amount necessary to kill 50% of Swiss-Webster mice injected with that dose.

The effect of botulinum toxin lasts 8-12 weeks.

Indications

Current indications for BOTOX® injections include the following:

  • Hyperfunctional lines (eg, glabellar, forehead, crow’s feet, platysma, nasolabial lines)
  • Hemifacial spasm
  • Post–Bell palsy synkinesis
  • Blepharospasm
  • Spasmodic dysphonia
  • Strabismus
  • Cervical dystonia
  • Frey syndrome
  • Achalasia
  • Hyperhidrosis
  • Sialorrhea
  • Migraines

Contraindications

Contraindications to BOTOX® injections include the following:

  • Pregnancy
  • Lactation
  • History of reaction to toxin or albumin
  • Preexisting motor neuron disease (eg, myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, neuropathies)
  • Age younger than 12 years
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Coincident administration of aminoglycosides can potentiate paralysis (relative contraindication)

Treatment

Patient Selection

Several prospective studies by Blitzer et al and Pribitkin et al have examined the effectiveness of botulinum injections for hyperfunctional lines. From these studies, certain characteristics of successfully treated patients have been identified. The ideal patients have thin skin, fine wrinkles, lines that are exacerbated by muscle contraction, and hyperfunctional lines that can be spread out with their fingers. Blitzer et al describe a “glabellar spread test” in which the physician is able to spread out the hyperfunctional glabellar lines to project the maximum benefit that a paralytic injection could achieve.

Candidates that have received minimal improvement from botulinum injections include those that failed the spread test, those with previous surgery near treated areas, those with thick skin or deep dermal scarring, and those with actinic skin changes. Facial lines resulting from the loss of dermal elasticity associated with aging are unlikely to respond to botulinum toxin injections. These areas are more appropriately treated with injectable fillers, which efface the static rhytides.

Treatment

Before the procedure is undertaken, a thorough history (including prior facial surgical procedures) and medication review are undertaken. Attention is focused on looking for those patients with contraindications as previously discussed. Preprocedure photographs are often taken by the individual surgeons’ photography studio. A close-up photograph that isolates the area of interest should be taken, as well as a full-face photograph. Photographs are taken at rest and during muscle contraction.

Physical examination concentrates on the identification of prior facial surgical sites, the assessment of the thickness of the skin, and the quality of the skin. Ahn et al note that thicker skinned patients often require higher doses. In addition, the accentuation of hyperfunctional lines with muscle contraction is noted as well as the ability to smooth out these lines with the spread test. Patients with larger muscles, such as men, also require higher doses of BOTOX®. Follow-up photographs are taken 3-4 weeks postinjection.

Botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) arrives on dry ice and must be stored frozen at temperatures lower than -4°C. It comes in a 100-U bottle. One unit is defined as the median lethal dose in mice. The median lethal dose in humans is estimated at 3000 U. The toxin generally is mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.9% nonpreserved sterile saline solution, creating a concentration of 40U/mL.

Carruthers et al, in an outstanding consensus panel article, noted that panel members agreed that preserved saline could also be used. An insulin syringe with a 30-gauge needle works nicely for injection. The insulin syringe does not waste any of the solution in the hub of the syringe. Some clinicians are moving to 32-gauge needles, which demonstrate better patient tolerance.

The area of injection can be covered with topical anesthetic cream (eg, eutectic mix of local anesthetics [EMLA]) or can be anesthetized using ice. The solution then lasts up to 4 hours if refrigerated between injections, according to the manufacturer. Hexsel et al conducted a blinded multi-institution study and demonstrated that reconstituted BOTOX® retained its efficacy for up to 6 weeks when stored at 4°C.

Studies by Blitzer et al and Carruthers et al, and the BOTOX® Consensus Group provide some very reasonable dose suggestions, as follows:

  • Forehead
    • A total of 10-30 U should be sufficient for this area. The patient is instructed to contract the areas of concern to demonstrate the approximate location of the hyperfunctional muscle. The injections are divided into 2- to 4-U injections. Most authors recommend that all injections be at least 1 cm above an imaginary line drawn horizontally between the middle portions of the eyebrows to avoid brow ptosis. An imaginary vertical line is drawn passing through the pupil for a reproducible reference point.
    • The first injection of 3 U is placed 1.5 cm above the superior bony orbital rim on this imaginary line. The second injection of 3.0-3.5 U is injected at a point 1.5 cm superior and 1.5 cm lateral from the first injection. The last injection uses the same dose but is injected 1.5 cm superior and 1.5 medial to the first injection. In effect, this creates a letter V. This set of injections is repeated on the opposite side. The injections are massaged in a direction away from the orbit.
  • Glabellar region
    • This region can be divided into 2 areas. The superior-lateral region is the first area, and it is affected by the corrugator supercilii muscle. This muscle is responsible for the vertical furrow between the brows. Each muscle receives an injection of 10 U as follows: 5 U is injected into the medial portion of the muscle near its origin, and 5 U is injected in the mid portion of the muscle belly.
    • The central and inferomedial regions comprise the second area, and they are affected by the procerus muscle and depressor supercilii muscle. These muscles are responsible for the horizontal furrow at the root of the nose. A 6-U injection is placed into the middle of the procerus muscle belly, which is slightly off the midline (approximately 7 mm) and at the level of the superior orbital rims. The same injection is repeated on the opposite side. Then 3 U is injected into the depressor supercilii muscle, which is approximately 1 cm above the medial canthal tendon. Finally, 3 U then is injected on the opposite side. Great care must be taken not to inject the solution too deep, which may place BOTOX® into the orbit, causing an oculomotor paresis.
  • Periorbital crow’s feet: A total of 12 U is used per side. Injections are divided into 3 U each. Using the patient’s right eye as an example, the first injection is approximately 1 cm lateral to the lateral canthus at the outermost portion of the bony orbital rim. This correlates approximately with the 10-o’clock position of the orbicularis oculi muscle (some authors feel that this injection provides a chemical brow lift of several millimeters in the lateral brow region). This is followed by an injection of 3 U at the half-past-9 position. The last 2 injections are placed at the half-past-8 and half-past-7 positions. Once again, the BOTOX® must be placed outside the orbital rim to avoid intraorbital complications.
  • Nasolabial: This area has been difficult to inject and offers mixed results. Electromyograph (EMG)–guided injection of 2-3 U to paralyze the levator labii superioris alaeque nasi has demonstrated some success. The authors’ center does not use botulinum toxin in this area because of complications of upper lip paresis.
  • Platysma: Platysmal bands can be treated with the direct injection of botulinum toxin into the concerning band. Once the band is identified, 5 U can be injected at 1-cm to 3-cm intervals along the vertical line created by the platysma. Some authors find these areas more amenable to surgical treatment.

Electromyograph monitoring

Many authors have chosen to perform their injections under the guidance of EMG monitoring. This technique involves using a 27-gauge (1.5 in) polytef-coated EMG needle connected to an EMG recorder by an alligator clip on its shaft. The patient is asked to contract the muscle in question. The injection is placed where the maximal EMG recording can be found within the muscle. This technique ensures that the injection is at the portion of the muscle that is contributing most to the hyperfunctional facial line. As these injections have become routine, many centers have obtained satisfactory results without EMG guidance. Many physicians use a readily available 30-gauge insulin syringe instead. However, EMG-guided injections remain a useful adjunct in patients who have residual function after their initial injection.

Reinjection

If a patient feels that little benefit was derived from the original injection, reinjection can be performed 1 week postinjection. However, 2-3 weeks postinjection is probably a more practical time for a return clinic visit. Generally, 2.5-5 U are used for reinjection. Reinjection strategies are still evolving. Once the patient has a satisfactory result, the next visit is at 2-3 months or when the patient requests another treatment.

Complications

The most feared complication is temporary paralysis of nearby facial musculature. Approximately 1-3% of patients may experience a temporary upper lid or brow ptosis; the most troublesome complication to the patient is upper lid ptosis. This results from migration of the botulinum toxin to the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. The ptosis usually lasts 2-6 weeks. It can be treated with apraclonidine (Iopidine, Alcon). This is an alpha-adrenergic agent that stimulates the Müller muscle and immediately elevates the upper eyelid. This treatment can usually raise the eyelid 1-3 mm. The treatment of 1-2 drops 3 times per day continues until the ptosis resolves.

Bruising can occur, particularly if a small vein is lacerated or a patient is taking aspirin, vitamin E, or NSAIDs. Ideally, patients should stop taking these products 2 weeks before the procedure. Headaches can occur after BOTOX® injections; however, in one study by Carruthers et al, this did not exceed the placebo group.6 This is thought to be due to the trauma of the injection and not something inherent in the toxin. In fact, botulinum toxin injections are extremely safe. To date, no significant long-term hazards of botulinum toxin injections have been identified in excess of placebo groups.

Future

The popularity of BOTOX® is unmatched in cosmetic surgery. The use and scope of botulinum toxin increases every year. Patients have shown a high degree of satisfaction with the procedure. Current research focuses on using BOTOX® as an adjunct to a myriad of surgical and ablative procedures.

Botulinum toxin A now has been used in significant numbers for 20 years. Its injection has proved to be an extremely safe strategy for selectively inducing muscle paralysis.

DR MICHELE KOO, MD, FACS, BOARD CERTIFIED PLASTIC SURGEON , ST LOUIS, MISSOURI hopes that this is helpful information. She will only suggest Botox for you if she feels it will be helpful and worthwhile for you based on your cosmetic goals for your face.

Can you still look normal and get BOTOX and filler for your face?

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Before Juvederm by Dr Michele Koo

After Juvederm by Dr Michele Koo

Dr Michele Koo, MD, FACS

Board Certified Plastic Surgeon, St Louis, Missouri

314-984-8331

Dr Michele Koo feels that it is very safe to use BOTOX for facial wrinkles in the forehead, between the eyebrows, crowsfeet area, in the upper and lower lip and even in the neck bands.

Our improved understanding of the pathophysiology of facial lines, wrinkles, and furrows has broadened the treatment options for a variety of facial cosmetic blemishes. The persistence or recurrence of certain facial rhytids after surgery has confirmed the lack of full comprehension of their origin. Glabellar forehead furrows (frown lines) and lateral canthal rhytids (crow’s feet) have been the most popular facial lines that have been shown to be mostly the result of regional hyperkinetic muscles, and their eradication may be more suitable, at times, to chemodenervation than to soft-tissue fillers, skin resurfacing, or surgical resection. Aesthetic surgical procedures that have yielded suboptimal results may also occur from failure to recognize other causative factors including hyperkinetic or dynamic musculature, which may contribute to etiology of the visible soft-tissue changes and lack of persistent effect after surgery. Chemodenervation with botulinum toxin A (Botox) has proven to be useful both as a primary treatment for certain facial rhytids and as an adjunctive agent for a variety of facial aesthetic procedures to obtain optimal results.

The logical approach to facial rejuvenation is facilitated when one first (through an assessment and diagnosis of the nature of the pathology) differentiates quantitative from qualitative changes in facial soft tissue. Quantitative and malpositional changes have traditionally required a surgical approach: the excision or repositioning of soft tissue (skin, muscle, and fat). Conversely, qualitative changes may require the fortification of the soft tissue by mechanical, chemo- or laserexfoliation, or augmentation of a particular soft-tissue plane. Most recently, a focus has been directed to prevention with sun protection, skin care, and improved nutrition as well as the realization of other causative risk factors that include hyperfunctional and dynamic components of facial lines.

Hyperdynamic (hyperkinetic, hyperfunctional) or long-term facial muscular animation seems to contribute to the etiology of many undesired facial rhytids and furrows. The presumption that facial lines were the result of, in part, forces generated by local muscular actions was first observed post-mortem on a microanatomic basis by Pierard and Lapiere.  Focal denervation of particular facial muscles has been shown to improve overall facial appearance not only by temporarily eliminating rhytids but also by improving malpositional changes of the overlying soft tissue and possibly the results of particular facial aesthetic surgical procedures discussed herein

The interest in chemodenervation and specifically the use of botulinum toxin as a therapeutic agent for weakening particular skeletal muscles dates back to the 1920s. Almost 30 years later, pediatric ophthalmologist Dr. Alan Scott collaborated with Dr. Edward J. Schantz in the preparation of a batch of crystalline toxin to determine its effectiveness as an injectable agent for producing transient weakness of extraocular muscles and permanent changes in ocular alignment.  This had remained the source of botulinum toxin type A until 1997 as the commercially available product, Botox (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, Calif.). After many years and experiences with this product, supplies were finally exhausted, and Botox was reformulated to what is currently used worldwide.

The toxins of Clostridium botulinum are classified into eight immunologically distinguishable exotoxins. The type A toxin is most easily produced in culture and was the first one obtained in a highly purified, stable, and crystalline form. The principal effect of muscle paralysis is caused by the inhibition of the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The paralytic effect of the toxin is dose related, with the peak of the effect occurring 5 to 7 days after injection.  Denervated muscle histopathology shows muscle atrophy and a mild degree of demyelinative changes at the nerve terminal.  Axonal nerve sprouting seems to be a usual response to chemodenervation and may diminish true clinical muscular atrophy (hence long-term beneficial effects in some regions). Single-fiber electromyography studies indicate abnormal neuromuscular transmission in muscles distant from the site of injection despite the absence of clinical weakness, indicating the potential for spread of the toxin that could be significant at higher doses. These observations and effects supported by some good experimental data provide a rationale for treatment protocol for the use of Botox in a variety of disorders.

Botox is presently approved for the treatment of strabismus and blepharospasm associated with dystonia (including benign essential blepharospasm or VII cranial nerve disorders) in patients 12 years of age and above.  Although not (FDA) approved for its use, many have experience with a multitude of other clinical applications of botulinum toxin, including the treatment of bruxism, stuttering, painful rigidity, lumbosacral pain and back spasms, radiculopathy with secondary muscle spasm, spastic bladder, achalasis, tremor, involuntary tics,  tension headaches, neuromuscular paralysis, lower eyelid spastic entropion, aberrant regeneration of the facial nerve (after Bell’s palsy etc.), acquired nystagmus, corneal pathology/amblyopia therapy aided by the effects of occlusion, and in periorbital reconstructive surgery.

Many experienced clinicians had noted the improvement of facial rhytids in their patients who had received Botox for a variety of facial spastic disorders. This discovery, in conjunction with a prelude to a better understanding of the anatomic basis of several facial frown lines, forced the question of the possible benefit of chemodenervation for certain facial wrinkles.

The treatment of glabellar frown lines enjoyed early attention owing to the experience of those who treated patients with benign essential blepharospasm, which typically involved injection of toxin into the medial eyebrows (corrugators). Other targeted facial hyperkinetic lines that gained early popularity included the treatment of lateral canthal rhytids (crow’s feet) and horizontal forehead furrows. More recently, the applications have extended to congenital and traumatic facial asymmetry, postsurgical eyebrow asymmetry (including dyskinesis) and facial paralysis, orbicularis hypertrophy (of the lower eyelids), perioral rhytids, hyperfunctional midfacial animation lines, soft-tissue malposition, and as an adjunct to endoscopic forehead lifts, laser skin resurfacing and injectable agents for soft-tissue augmentation.

Understanding the anatomic relationships and functional features of a variety of facial muscles to the surrounding soft tissue provides the additional necessary groundwork for the treatment rationale of chemodenervation for a variety of aesthetic displeasures.

The palpebral component of the orbicularis oculi surrounds the pretarsal and proximal septal aspects and is essentially the sphincter muscle of the eyelids responsible for blinking and gentle eyelid closure. Its direct antagonist is the levator palpebrae muscle. Forceful contraction of the orbital component of the orbicularis oculi induces concentric folds emanating from the lateral canthus. Some of the fibers of the superomedial orbital component function as depressors of the medial eyebrow. These fibers constitute the depressor supercilii.  The superolateral orbital orbicularis oculi acts, in part, as a depressor of the lateral eyebrow. The corrugator supercilii serves to draw the eyebrow inferiorly and medially, and as such produces the vertical glabellar frown lines. The procerus muscle, in part, draws the medial (head of the) eyebrows inferiorly and produces the transverse wrinkles over the bridge of the nose. The main antagonist of all of the eyebrow depressors is the frontalis muscle. The zygomaticus major muscle draws the angle of the mouth superiorly, laterally, and posteriorly with actions of laughing, smiling, and chewing. The zygomaticus minor muscle functions as one of the lip elevators and with the zygomaticus major contributes to the nasolabial fold. Forceful contraction of the zygomaticus muscles in animation (smiling) produces synergistic effects in the periorbital region, accentuated by the contraction of the orbital orbicularis and enhancing the radially oriented folds at the lateral canthus, exaggeration of the skin tension lines of the midface, and recruitment of lower eyelid soft-tissue redundancy (by elevating the cheek) that is not evident in the nonanimated state. The orbicularis oris is responsible for forceful lip closure and serves as a sphincter to the mouth. Contraction of this muscle induces folds that radiate from the vermilion border. This muscle in part is an antagonist to the lip elevators. An understanding of the basic anatomy of facial expression is essential not only for the appropriate approach to the treatment of hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows but also a methodology to avoid complications discussed later.

Botulinum toxin A is a labile but highly potent toxin. Each vial (supplied by Allergan) contains approximately 100 units of toxin in a crystalline complex. The toxin should be stored immediately upon receipt in the office freezer at -5°C or lower in this crystalline form. Toxin reconstitution should be performed just before actual injection for maximal potency. Dilution should be followed carefully with the diluent of nonpreserved saline as instructed for specific concentrations as described in the package insert; however, most clinical uses of Botox are well suited for a dilution of 2.5 units per 0.1 ml, which is easily obtained by mixing 4.0 ml of nonpreserved saline to the vial. The use of preserved saline has been suggested by some authors for hope of extending the shelf life and potency once reconstituted; however, there has been concern regarding the effect of the preservative, turbulence with dilution, and agitation in denaturing (hence reduced effect) of the delicate toxin.

Once reconstituted, the toxin should be used as quickly as feasible. The package insert suggests that the product be used within 4 hours; however, many users have noted reasonable effects with the use of the product for up to 30 days.  In Dr Fagien’s experience, a notable decline in clinical potency occurs after 48 hours of reconstitution that may affect depth of focal paralysis and longevity of effect. Further, the relative stability of the reconstituted toxin is felt to be best maintained by refrigeration (not freezing), and it is suggested that the product be kept cool at every opportunity. To the best of my knowledge, however, there have been no studies to substantiate or refute claims of the duration of potency of the toxin after reconstitution.

Early investigators had suggested up to 10 to 20 units or more per site to affect the targeted muscles of facial expression.  However, one can achieve effects with far less toxin (2.5 units per site) and maintain longevity of effect for comparable periods of time. In my experience, this dose is effective for an average of 4 to 6 months. These lower doses in smaller volumes also serve to reduce unwanted effects and complications (see below). Concentrations much less that 2.5 units per 0.1 ml can induce a weakening effect on the targeted muscle but seem to do so for a much shorter duration. Additionally, men (or even women with clinically evident large hypertrophic target muscles-particularly corrugators or frontalis muscles) seem to require a slightly higher dose per injection site (up to 5.0 units per site), otherwise resulting in only mild to moderate improvement of hyperfunctional rhytids with shorter duration of effects. Diluted toxin should be drawn up into 1.0 ml (T.B. syringes) through an 18-gauge needle to minimize physical trauma to the toxin.

As in all procedures, patients desire maximum benefit with minimal side effects and morbidity. It may therefore be advisable that patients temporarily discontinue aspirin and other drugs that can affect bleeding time before Botox injection, similar to how you might instruct your patients before surgery. This, however, is not mandatory but may reduce or eliminate facial bruising that can last for several weeks. If minimal to no bruising occurs after injection of Botox, patients can typically return to work unnoticed less than 1 hour after treatment.

After the toxin is drawn up by 18-gauge needles into 1.0-ml syringes, the needle is then replaced by a short, 30-gauge needle for injection. The use of local anesthesia is relatively contraindicated and unnecessary. Alcohol may be applied to the injection sites but should be allowed to dry fully before injection of toxin owing to toxin lability. I currently do not employ the use of electromyographic guidance, as I find this cumbersome and unnecessary. Electromyographic guidance may, however, be useful when getting started with chemodenervation for general orientation. Some of the literature on the cosmetic applications of botulinum toxin A describes and illustrates sites for injection with reference points targeted at the actual wrinkle line rather than the causative muscle.

Skin demarcations and sites of eventual injections of toxin can be made over the presumed belly or muscle mass of the regional muscle of facial expression and not typically at the site of the maximal dermal depression, which at times may be quite distant from the mass of the effecting muscle. For the larger, deeper muscles such as the corrugator supercilii, it is most useful and efficacious to inject toxin deep to the overlying muscles (frontalis and orbicularis) or directly into the belly of the targeted muscle. Typically, four or five injection sites at a dose of 2.5 to 5.0 units per site are satisfactory in eliminating focal muscle tone and voluntary contraction of the corrugators. More superficial application may affect the more superficial muscles, predominantly, without achieving the desired effect. This is most easily facilitated by familiarization with the pertinent facial soft-tissue anatomy and observing the dermal and muscular effects of the frown line on command. I have found it helpful to isolate the area by placing the thumb of the nondominant hand beneath the eyebrow and superior orbital rim. This serves to steady the patient’s head and target region, orient the injector to the supraorbital notch and neurovascular bundle, and avoid inadvertent injection into the orbit. The needle is inserted to the presumed level of the muscle mass of the corrugators followed by injection of the toxin. The thinner, orbicularis muscle (and even the procerus muscle) responds favorably to a more superficial, subcutaneous injection of Botox.

Unlike the other larger muscles of facial expression that may require direct contact of the toxin to the majority of the muscle mass, hence requiring injection more directly into the muscle, the relatively thin orbicularis muscle (and isolated procerus) seems to be satisfactorily affected by injecting the toxin into the subcutaneous space overlying the muscle. This not only reduces the chance of significant ecchymoses but may therefore maintain the potency that could be reduced by bleeding. Additionally, injection into the subcutaneous space may allow for more local (even) diffusion over the targeted muscle and provide an additional safety barrier to structures deep to the muscle. For lateral canthal rhytids (crow’s feet), three or four injections are given with particular avoidance of the pretarsal orbicularis of the upper and lower eyelid. This is achieved by directing needle insertion temporal to the lateral canthus near the lateral orbital rim and distant to the eyelid margin. The procerus muscle can be injected at one or two sites just beneath the (skin) transverse wrinkle at the nasal bridge. This superficial plane also avoids orbital injection. Hyperkinetic horizontal forehead furrows seem to respond favorably to either subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of the toxin, presumably since the frontalis is the only active muscle in this region. Weakening, rather than complete frontalis denervation, may also be preferable in some individuals to avoid brow ptosis. These injections are most effective by administering a uniform grid, whereby approximately nine or more sites are injected across the forehead. Three or more sites over each side are positioned in a vertical line above the mid-eyebrow. Additional sites are positioned vertically in the mid-forehead region. This affords focal frontalis muscle weakening at the medial aspects of each muscle group. A more homogeneous treatment of the forehead avoids focal areas of residual function that can become quite noticeable in lieu of complete absence of adjacent furrows. Typically, 2.5 units (0.1 ml) are administered at each site. Injections over the lateral eyebrow are minimized or avoided to reduce the potential for lateral eyebrow ptosis. Contrary to much of the reported concern regarding staying upright or avoiding physical activity for several hours after the injections,  I have not found it necessary to instruct patients on this. Cosmetics may be applied immediately after injection.

Although, theoretically, the effect of the toxin is described as occurring between 3 and 7 days after injection, I have noted consistently an earlier onset of effect compared with those patients who experience Botox for the treatment of eyelid and facial spastic disorders such as benign essential blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. Occasionally, a patient-recipient of Botox for hyperkinetic facial lines experiences the effects within several hours for reasons not well understood. Although the immediate treatment benefits reflect the toxins’ ability to temporarily weaken or paralyze those muscles responsible for the muscular component of the hyperkinetic facial lines, the theoretic suggestion (not yet proven) is that repeated injections into the same muscles over time could produce a sort of disuse atrophy that would limit the development of certain facial lines in younger individuals and possibly eliminate or reduce (over time) established facial lines and furrows.

However, because of the entity of axonal sprouting  (discussed earlier) and the fact that patients typically return for additional treatment after the muscles have regained near complete clinical function (i.e., the wrinkle has returned), true long-term muscular atrophy may not be the only possible cause for long-term improvement in some individuals that may also reflect (in part) alteration in facial animation patterns and remodeling of the overlying soft tissue.

Botulinum toxin A also has been shown to be useful for a variety of other facial cosmetic problems. I have found it useful in even subtle cases of aberrant regeneration of the facial (seventh cranial) nerve (for instance after recovery of a Bell’s palsy), which although it may not induce a significant visual impairment, poses significant embarrassment to some. At times, very low doses are quite effective such as 1.0 unit or less per site administered over the pretarsal orbicularis in the same manner given for the treatment of (benign essential) blepharospasm. Botox can also be used to achieve symmetry in congenital and acquired unilateral facial paralysis by weakening the contralateral side.

Eyebrow asymmetry can be seen in a variety of scenarios including facial nerve trauma after brow lifts, other surgically induced facial paralysis, habit in those with long-standing (even post-corrected) ipsilateral blepharoptosis, asymmetric nonpathologic facial expression, etc. As an alternative to brow lifting the more ptotic eyebrow, one could consider eyebrow (focal frontalis muscle) chemodenervation to enhance symmetry for those who are unwilling to undergo surgery but who desire a more symmetric appearance. The sites and number of injections depend on where the effect is desired and usually are administered into (or overlying) frontalis muscle approximately 1.0 cm above the eyebrow to avoid the brow depressors.

One can induce creative changes in the eyebrow shape and position. For instance, it is well known that with injection of Botox for glabellar frown lines into the medial eyebrow, the adjacent medial frontalis muscle can at times be affected (by a higher injection that weakens the frontalis muscle focally), inducing a mild relative medial brow ptosis and at times effecting a more pleasing contour to the eyebrow (especially in flat brows). Brow contour can be even more accentuated by effecting a mild lateral brow elevation by injecting the lateral (sub-brow) orbital component of the orbicularis muscle, enhancing the effect of the antagonist lateral frontalis muscle. This method can be employed when injecting for crow’s feet with extension of the lateral canthal area injections (2.5 units/0.1 ml) into the lateral sub-brow region.

Orbicularis (oculi) muscle hypertrophy of the lower eyelids may also be effectively treated using very low concentrations (1.0 unit/0.05 ml) of toxin into or overlying the visibly hypertrophic (thickened) muscle. Low doses may still cause a mild but often acceptable degree of lower eyelid retraction. Two or three injections are administered at the central lower eyelid and lateral canthus overlying the affected areas. Higher concentrations, however, may induce significant paralytic eyelid retraction or ectropion and may also impair the nasolacrimal pumping action of the orbicularis muscle, inducing epiphora.

Similar caution and consideration can be applied to tone down the effects of the zygomaticus major and minor muscles. The zygomaticus major muscle not only affects the elevation of the corner of the mouth with smiling but in doing this recruits the enhancement of crow’s feet, which can be quite exaggerated in some individuals. The zygomaticus minor muscle originates similarly to the zygomaticus major muscle and inserts more medially into the upper lip. Both of these muscles, in part, when active, deepen the nasolabial fold. By using low dosages (2.5 units/0.2 ml) in the proximal aspects (far from the mouth) near the areas of origin, with efforts made to inject toxin mostly at the level of the edge of the inferior aspect of the orbicularis of the lower eyelid , one can soften their additive effect on the lateral canthal rhytids and nasolabial folds. One or two injections administered over the mid to lateral malar eminence are usually satisfactory in obtaining the desired effect without incurring complications, particularly paralysis of the ipsilateral upper lip.

Finally, Botox has been shown to be useful as a primary treatment in reducing fine perioral rhytids (lip stick lines).  Approximately 1.0 to 1.5 units of toxin is injected adjacent to the fine vertical rhytids overlying the orbicularis oris muscle close to the vermilion ridge. An added noted aesthetic effect at times with this treatment is the appearance of fuller (pseudo-augmented) lips because the sphincter muscle is weakened along the vermilion border to assume a more everted position.

Those experienced with CO2 laser abrasion have noted the first recurrent rhytids in the lower eyelid and lateral canthus. At times, in patients where there is significant hyperdynamics especially at the lateral canthus and perioral region, the rhytids can actually appear worse after laser skin resurfacing by any method . Pretreatment with Botox may improve the smoothing effect of the new remodeled/resurfaced skin long enough to effect more permanent eradication of wrinkles.

Similarly, this approach may be beneficial in pretreatment for those individuals who will undergo brow lifting procedures by enhancing results from weakening the inferior vector force (lateral orbital orbicularis oculi muscle, the antagonist to the frontalis muscle and eyebrow elevation), which would promote and provide maintenance of the elevated eyebrow position.

Reinforcement during lateral canthal suspension procedures such as the lateral tarsal strip or the lateral retinacular suspension  can be aided by injecting Botox (2.5 units/0.1 ml) around the lateral canthus as in the method described for the treatment of lateral canthal rhytids that not only diminished the regional rhytids but also reduced local orbicularis oculi function that, in part, may compromise the position and security of the lateral canthus with repeated muscular contraction.

Another very useful application of Botox has been in patients with soft-tissue contour abnormalities or atrophy that benefit from the coincident use of both modalities. Preceding the injection or surgical placement of the soft-tissue augmentation material by approximately 1 week, Botox is administered for focal weakness or paralysis. Injection of the dermal filler, subdermal fat, or surgical implantation (of alloplastic or allogeneic material) is then given into the paralyzed or muscularly weakened area. The denervation serves at least three purposes. First, it eliminates or reduces the dynamic/muscular component of rhytid formation. Second, there is some theoretic suggestion that it may increase the longevity of the dermal implant by reducing the supposed mechanical inflammatory influence on atrophy of the implant. Third, it may also simply reduce the immediate microextrusion at the injection sites by repetitive muscular action, etc. This can be seen by weakening the medial brow depressors before administering collagen or fat to the glabella or injecting Botox to the lip elevators and depressors before soft-tissue augmentation of the nasolabial folds and in lip augmentation, respectively. Dosages to the glabella are similar to those used in the primary treatment to any particular region. Lower dosages (1.25 units/0.1 ml) may be applied to the lips before augmentation. The combination of chemodenervation and soft-tissue augmentation (particularly autologous collagen) in these areas has been shown to be highly synergistic.

Other Observations

Not uncommonly, patients after receiving Botox (not necessarily particular to one facial region but more prevalent in those injected in or around the eyebrows and forehead) note a generalized (almost euphoric) feeling of improved sense of well being. I have assumed that this could be related to the relief of muscular contraction (tension) etc., similar to that in the classic muscular contraction or tension headaches. This finding has been consistent and possibly suggests even more expanded uses for the toxin. Most effects for the various cosmetic applications of Botox last (as in the functional/spastic disorders) between 4 and 6 months. Patients must be counseled and aware of the typical (transient) effects of chemodenervation on their hyperfunctional lines and the likely need for maintenance treatment.

Complications

Reported adverse reactions with the general use of Botox for all approved applications include blepharoptosis, diplopia, globe perforations, retrobulbar hemorrhage, Adies pupil, worsening of dry eye symptoms, lagophthalmos, photophobia, epiphora, ectropion, and exposure keratitis.  Complications that have arisen with the cosmetic applications of Botox have included most of the above-noted reactions and additional unwanted temporary effects including ecchymoses, eyebrow ptosis and asymmetry, and mouth drop. Unwanted side effects, such as blepharoptosis and mild lower eyelid retraction , typically last only a few weeks at most as the dose of migrated toxin to the affected muscle is usually significantly reduced. The temporary use of over the counter ocular decongestants (eyedrops) that contain adrenergic agents (with coincidental side effects of the eyedrops that include temporary contraction of Muller’s muscle and an elevated upper eyelid margin position) for allergy/congestion (Naphcon A, Vasocon A, Opcon A) may prove beneficial to those patients who are significantly symptomatic from the transient blepharoptosis.

The use of Botox for the treatment of hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows is merely another effective primary or adjunctive therapy to offer your cosmetic patients in the spectrum of treatment options for full facial rejuvenation. Unwanted side effects can be minimized and beneficial effects maximized with a thorough understanding of the facial soft-tissue anatomy, proper patient selection, and administration of the lowest effective dosages with minimal volume of delivery. It most often does not replace surgery, skin resurfacing, soft-tissue augmentation, or skin care. However, it has been shown to be quite useful when used alone or in conjunction with the variety of treatment options to give your selected patients the most effective and comprehensive solutions for a more youthful appearance

Once reconstituted, the toxin should be used as quickly as feasible. The package insert suggests that the product be used within 4 hours; however, many users have noted reasonable effects with the use of the product for up to 30 days.  In Dr Fagien’s experience, a notable decline in clinical potency occurs after 48 hours of reconstitution that may affect depth of focal paralysis and longevity of effect. Further, the relative stability of the reconstituted toxin is felt to be best maintained by refrigeration (not freezing), and it is suggested that the product be kept cool at every opportunity. To the best of my knowledge, however, there have been no studies to substantiate or refute claims of the duration of potency of the toxin after reconstitution.

Early investigators had suggested up to 10 to 20 units or more per site to affect the targeted muscles of facial expression.  However, one can achieve effects with far less toxin (2.5 units per site) and maintain longevity of effect for comparable periods of time. In my experience, this dose is effective for an average of 4 to 6 months. These lower doses in smaller volumes also serve to reduce unwanted effects and complications (see below). Concentrations much less that 2.5 units per 0.1 ml can induce a weakening effect on the targeted muscle but seem to do so for a much shorter duration. Additionally, men (or even women with clinically evident large hypertrophic target muscles-particularly corrugators or frontalis muscles) seem to require a slightly higher dose per injection site (up to 5.0 units per site), otherwise resulting in only mild to moderate improvement of hyperfunctional rhytids with shorter duration of effects. Diluted toxin should be drawn up into 1.0 ml (T.B. syringes) through an 18-gauge needle to minimize physical trauma to the toxin.

As in all procedures, patients desire maximum benefit with minimal side effects and morbidity. It may therefore be advisable that patients temporarily discontinue aspirin and other drugs that can affect bleeding time before Botox injection, similar to how you might instruct your patients before surgery. This, however, is not mandatory but may reduce or eliminate facial bruising that can last for several weeks. If minimal to no bruising occurs after injection of Botox, patients can typically return to work unnoticed less than 1 hour after treatment.

After the toxin is drawn up by 18-gauge needles into 1.0-ml syringes, the needle is then replaced by a short, 30-gauge needle for injection. The use of local anesthesia is relatively contraindicated and unnecessary. Alcohol may be applied to the injection sites but should be allowed to dry fully before injection of toxin owing to toxin lability. I currently do not employ the use of electromyographic guidance, as I find this cumbersome and unnecessary. Electromyographic guidance may, however, be useful when getting started with chemodenervation for general orientation. Some of the literature on the cosmetic applications of botulinum toxin A describes and illustrates sites for injection with reference points targeted at the actual wrinkle line rather than the causative muscle.

Skin demarcations and sites of eventual injections of toxin can be made over the presumed belly or muscle mass of the regional muscle of facial expression and not typically at the site of the maximal dermal depression, which at times may be quite distant from the mass of the effecting muscle. For the larger, deeper muscles such as the corrugator supercilii, it is most useful and efficacious to inject toxin deep to the overlying muscles (frontalis and orbicularis) or directly into the belly of the targeted muscle. Typically, four or five injection sites at a dose of 2.5 to 5.0 units per site are satisfactory in eliminating focal muscle tone and voluntary contraction of the corrugators. More superficial application may affect the more superficial muscles, predominantly, without achieving the desired effect. This is most easily facilitated by familiarization with the pertinent facial soft-tissue anatomy and observing the dermal and muscular effects of the frown line on command. I have found it helpful to isolate the area by placing the thumb of the nondominant hand beneath the eyebrow and superior orbital rim. This serves to steady the patient’s head and target region, orient the injector to the supraorbital notch and neurovascular bundle, and avoid inadvertent injection into the orbit. The needle is inserted to the presumed level of the muscle mass of the corrugators followed by injection of the toxin. The thinner, orbicularis muscle (and even the procerus muscle) responds favorably to a more superficial, subcutaneous injection of Botox.

Unlike the other larger muscles of facial expression that may require direct contact of the toxin to the majority of the muscle mass, hence requiring injection more directly into the muscle, the relatively thin orbicularis muscle (and isolated procerus) seems to be satisfactorily affected by injecting the toxin into the subcutaneous space overlying the muscle. This not only reduces the chance of significant ecchymoses but may therefore maintain the potency that could be reduced by bleeding. Additionally, injection into the subcutaneous space may allow for more local (even) diffusion over the targeted muscle and provide an additional safety barrier to structures deep to the muscle. For lateral canthal rhytids (crow’s feet), three or four injections are given with particular avoidance of the pretarsal orbicularis of the upper and lower eyelid. This is achieved by directing needle insertion temporal to the lateral canthus near the lateral orbital rim and distant to the eyelid margin. The procerus muscle can be injected at one or two sites just beneath the (skin) transverse wrinkle at the nasal bridge. This superficial plane also avoids orbital injection. Hyperkinetic horizontal forehead furrows seem to respond favorably to either subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of the toxin, presumably since the frontalis is the only active muscle in this region. Weakening, rather than complete frontalis denervation, may also be preferable in some individuals to avoid brow ptosis. These injections are most effective by administering a uniform grid, whereby approximately nine or more sites are injected across the forehead. Three or more sites over each side are positioned in a vertical line above the mid-eyebrow. Additional sites are positioned vertically in the mid-forehead region. This affords focal frontalis muscle weakening at the medial aspects of each muscle group. A more homogeneous treatment of the forehead avoids focal areas of residual function that can become quite noticeable in lieu of complete absence of adjacent furrows. Typically, 2.5 units (0.1 ml) are administered at each site. Injections over the lateral eyebrow are minimized or avoided to reduce the potential for lateral eyebrow ptosis. Contrary to much of the reported concern regarding staying upright or avoiding physical activity for several hours after the injections,  I have not found it necessary to instruct patients on this. Cosmetics may be applied immediately after injection.

Although, theoretically, the effect of the toxin is described as occurring between 3 and 7 days after injection, I have noted consistently an earlier onset of effect compared with those patients who experience Botox for the treatment of eyelid and facial spastic disorders such as benign essential blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. Occasionally, a patient-recipient of Botox for hyperkinetic facial lines experiences the effects within several hours for reasons not well understood. Although the immediate treatment benefits reflect the toxins’ ability to temporarily weaken or paralyze those muscles responsible for the muscular component of the hyperkinetic facial lines, the theoretic suggestion (not yet proven) is that repeated injections into the same muscles over time could produce a sort of disuse atrophy that would limit the development of certain facial lines in younger individuals and possibly eliminate or reduce (over time) established facial lines and furrows.

However, because of the entity of axonal sprouting  (discussed earlier) and the fact that patients typically return for additional treatment after the muscles have regained near complete clinical function (i.e., the wrinkle has returned), true long-term muscular atrophy may not be the only possible cause for long-term improvement in some individuals that may also reflect (in part) alteration in facial animation patterns and remodeling of the overlying soft tissue.

Botulinum toxin A also has been shown to be useful for a variety of other facial cosmetic problems. I have found it useful in even subtle cases of aberrant regeneration of the facial (seventh cranial) nerve (for instance after recovery of a Bell’s palsy), which although it may not induce a significant visual impairment, poses significant embarrassment to some. At times, very low doses are quite effective such as 1.0 unit or less per site administered over the pretarsal orbicularis in the same manner given for the treatment of (benign essential) blepharospasm. Botox can also be used to achieve symmetry in congenital and acquired unilateral facial paralysis by weakening the contralateral side.

Eyebrow asymmetry can be seen in a variety of scenarios including facial nerve trauma after brow lifts, other surgically induced facial paralysis, habit in those with long-standing (even post-corrected) ipsilateral blepharoptosis, asymmetric nonpathologic facial expression, etc. As an alternative to brow lifting the more ptotic eyebrow, one could consider eyebrow (focal frontalis muscle) chemodenervation to enhance symmetry for those who are unwilling to undergo surgery but who desire a more symmetric appearance. The sites and number of injections depend on where the effect is desired and usually are administered into (or overlying) frontalis muscle approximately 1.0 cm above the eyebrow to avoid the brow depressors.

One can induce creative changes in the eyebrow shape and position. For instance, it is well known that with injection of Botox for glabellar frown lines into the medial eyebrow, the adjacent medial frontalis muscle can at times be affected (by a higher injection that weakens the frontalis muscle focally), inducing a mild relative medial brow ptosis and at times effecting a more pleasing contour to the eyebrow (especially in flat brows). Brow contour can be even more accentuated by effecting a mild lateral brow elevation by injecting the lateral (sub-brow) orbital component of the orbicularis muscle, enhancing the effect of the antagonist lateral frontalis muscle. This method can be employed when injecting for crow’s feet with extension of the lateral canthal area injections (2.5 units/0.1 ml) into the lateral sub-brow region.

Orbicularis (oculi) muscle hypertrophy of the lower eyelids may also be effectively treated using very low concentrations (1.0 unit/0.05 ml) of toxin into or overlying the visibly hypertrophic (thickened) muscle. Low doses may still cause a mild but often acceptable degree of lower eyelid retraction. Two or three injections are administered at the central lower eyelid and lateral canthus overlying the affected areas. Higher concentrations, however, may induce significant paralytic eyelid retraction or ectropion and may also impair the nasolacrimal pumping action of the orbicularis muscle, inducing epiphora.

Similar caution and consideration can be applied to tone down the effects of the zygomaticus major and minor muscles. The zygomaticus major muscle not only affects the elevation of the corner of the mouth with smiling but in doing this recruits the enhancement of crow’s feet, which can be quite exaggerated in some individuals. The zygomaticus minor muscle originates similarly to the zygomaticus major muscle and inserts more medially into the upper lip. Both of these muscles, in part, when active, deepen the nasolabial fold. By using low dosages (2.5 units/0.2 ml) in the proximal aspects (far from the mouth) near the areas of origin, with efforts made to inject toxin mostly at the level of the edge of the inferior aspect of the orbicularis of the lower eyelid , one can soften their additive effect on the lateral canthal rhytids and nasolabial folds. One or two injections administered over the mid to lateral malar eminence are usually satisfactory in obtaining the desired effect without incurring complications, particularly paralysis of the ipsilateral upper lip.

Finally, Botox has been shown to be useful as a primary treatment in reducing fine perioral rhytids (lip stick lines).  Approximately 1.0 to 1.5 units of toxin is injected adjacent to the fine vertical rhytids overlying the orbicularis oris muscle close to the vermilion ridge. An added noted aesthetic effect at times with this treatment is the appearance of fuller (pseudo-augmented) lips because the sphincter muscle is weakened along the vermilion border to assume a more everted position.

Those experienced with CO2 laser abrasion have noted the first recurrent rhytids in the lower eyelid and lateral canthus. At times, in patients where there is significant hyperdynamics especially at the lateral canthus and perioral region, the rhytids can actually appear worse after laser skin resurfacing by any method . Pretreatment with Botox may improve the smoothing effect of the new remodeled/resurfaced skin long enough to effect more permanent eradication of wrinkles.

Similarly, this approach may be beneficial in pretreatment for those individuals who will undergo brow lifting procedures by enhancing results from weakening the inferior vector force (lateral orbital orbicularis oculi muscle, the antagonist to the frontalis muscle and eyebrow elevation), which would promote and provide maintenance of the elevated eyebrow position.

Reinforcement during lateral canthal suspension procedures such as the lateral tarsal strip or the lateral retinacular suspension  can be aided by injecting Botox (2.5 units/0.1 ml) around the lateral canthus as in the method described for the treatment of lateral canthal rhytids that not only diminished the regional rhytids but also reduced local orbicularis oculi function that, in part, may compromise the position and security of the lateral canthus with repeated muscular contraction.

Another very useful application of Botox has been in patients with soft-tissue contour abnormalities or atrophy that benefit from the coincident use of both modalities. Preceding the injection or surgical placement of the soft-tissue augmentation material by approximately 1 week, Botox is administered for focal weakness or paralysis. Injection of the dermal filler, subdermal fat, or surgical implantation (of alloplastic or allogeneic material) is then given into the paralyzed or muscularly weakened area. The denervation serves at least three purposes. First, it eliminates or reduces the dynamic/muscular component of rhytid formation. Second, there is some theoretic suggestion that it may increase the longevity of the dermal implant by reducing the supposed mechanical inflammatory influence on atrophy of the implant. Third, it may also simply reduce the immediate microextrusion at the injection sites by repetitive muscular action, etc. This can be seen by weakening the medial brow depressors before administering collagen or fat to the glabella or injecting Botox to the lip elevators and depressors before soft-tissue augmentation of the nasolabial folds and in lip augmentation, respectively. Dosages to the glabella are similar to those used in the primary treatment to any particular region. Lower dosages (1.25 units/0.1 ml) may be applied to the lips before augmentation. The combination of chemodenervation and soft-tissue augmentation (particularly autologous collagen) in these areas has been shown to be highly synergistic.

Other Observations

Not uncommonly, patients after receiving Botox (not necessarily particular to one facial region but more prevalent in those injected in or around the eyebrows and forehead) note a generalized (almost euphoric) feeling of improved sense of well being. I have assumed that this could be related to the relief of muscular contraction (tension) etc., similar to that in the classic muscular contraction or tension headaches. This finding has been consistent and possibly suggests even more expanded uses for the toxin. Most effects for the various cosmetic applications of Botox last (as in the functional/spastic disorders) between 4 and 6 months. Patients must be counseled and aware of the typical (transient) effects of chemodenervation on their hyperfunctional lines and the likely need for maintenance treatment.

Complications

Reported adverse reactions with the general use of Botox for all approved applications include blepharoptosis, diplopia, globe perforations, retrobulbar hemorrhage, Adies pupil, worsening of dry eye symptoms, lagophthalmos, photophobia, epiphora, ectropion, and exposure keratitis.  Complications that have arisen with the cosmetic applications of Botox have included most of the above-noted reactions and additional unwanted temporary effects including ecchymoses, eyebrow ptosis and asymmetry, and mouth drop. Unwanted side effects, such as blepharoptosis and mild lower eyelid retraction , typically last only a few weeks at most as the dose of migrated toxin to the affected muscle is usually significantly reduced. The temporary use of over the counter ocular decongestants (eyedrops) that contain adrenergic agents (with coincidental side effects of the eyedrops that include temporary contraction of Muller’s muscle and an elevated upper eyelid margin position) for allergy/congestion (Naphcon A, Vasocon A, Opcon A) may prove beneficial to those patients who are significantly symptomatic from the transient blepharoptosis.

The use of Botox for the treatment of hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows is merely another effective primary or adjunctive therapy to offer your cosmetic patients in the spectrum of treatment options for full facial rejuvenation. Unwanted side effects can be minimized and beneficial effects maximized with a thorough understanding of the facial soft-tissue anatomy, proper patient selection, and administration of the lowest effective dosages with minimal volume of delivery. It most often does not replace surgery, skin resurfacing, soft-tissue augmentation, or skin care. However, it has been shown to be quite useful when used alone or in conjunction with the variety of treatment options to give your selected patients the most effective and comprehensive solutions for a more youthful appearance

Once reconstituted, the toxin should be used as quickly as feasible. The package insert suggests that the product be used within 4 hours; however, many users have noted reasonable effects with the use of the product for up to 30 days.  In Dr Fagien’s experience, a notable decline in clinical potency occurs after 48 hours of reconstitution that may affect depth of focal paralysis and longevity of effect. Further, the relative stability of the reconstituted toxin is felt to be best maintained by refrigeration (not freezing), and it is suggested that the product be kept cool at every opportunity. To the best of my knowledge, however, there have been no studies to substantiate or refute claims of the duration of potency of the toxin after reconstitution.

Early investigators had suggested up to 10 to 20 units or more per site to affect the targeted muscles of facial expression.  However, one can achieve effects with far less toxin (2.5 units per site) and maintain longevity of effect for comparable periods of time. In my experience, this dose is effective for an average of 4 to 6 months. These lower doses in smaller volumes also serve to reduce unwanted effects and complications (see below). Concentrations much less that 2.5 units per 0.1 ml can induce a weakening effect on the targeted muscle but seem to do so for a much shorter duration. Additionally, men (or even women with clinically evident large hypertrophic target muscles-particularly corrugators or frontalis muscles) seem to require a slightly higher dose per injection site (up to 5.0 units per site), otherwise resulting in only mild to moderate improvement of hyperfunctional rhytids with shorter duration of effects. Diluted toxin should be drawn up into 1.0 ml (T.B. syringes) through an 18-gauge needle to minimize physical trauma to the toxin.

As in all procedures, patients desire maximum benefit with minimal side effects and morbidity. It may therefore be advisable that patients temporarily discontinue aspirin and other drugs that can affect bleeding time before Botox injection, similar to how you might instruct your patients before surgery. This, however, is not mandatory but may reduce or eliminate facial bruising that can last for several weeks. If minimal to no bruising occurs after injection of Botox, patients can typically return to work unnoticed less than 1 hour after treatment.

After the toxin is drawn up by 18-gauge needles into 1.0-ml syringes, the needle is then replaced by a short, 30-gauge needle for injection. The use of local anesthesia is relatively contraindicated and unnecessary. Alcohol may be applied to the injection sites but should be allowed to dry fully before injection of toxin owing to toxin lability. I currently do not employ the use of electromyographic guidance, as I find this cumbersome and unnecessary. Electromyographic guidance may, however, be useful when getting started with chemodenervation for general orientation. Some of the literature on the cosmetic applications of botulinum toxin A describes and illustrates sites for injection with reference points targeted at the actual wrinkle line rather than the causative muscle.

Skin demarcations and sites of eventual injections of toxin can be made over the presumed belly or muscle mass of the regional muscle of facial expression and not typically at the site of the maximal dermal depression, which at times may be quite distant from the mass of the effecting muscle. For the larger, deeper muscles such as the corrugator supercilii, it is most useful and efficacious to inject toxin deep to the overlying muscles (frontalis and orbicularis) or directly into the belly of the targeted muscle. Typically, four or five injection sites at a dose of 2.5 to 5.0 units per site are satisfactory in eliminating focal muscle tone and voluntary contraction of the corrugators. More superficial application may affect the more superficial muscles, predominantly, without achieving the desired effect. This is most easily facilitated by familiarization with the pertinent facial soft-tissue anatomy and observing the dermal and muscular effects of the frown line on command. I have found it helpful to isolate the area by placing the thumb of the nondominant hand beneath the eyebrow and superior orbital rim. This serves to steady the patient’s head and target region, orient the injector to the supraorbital notch and neurovascular bundle, and avoid inadvertent injection into the orbit. The needle is inserted to the presumed level of the muscle mass of the corrugators followed by injection of the toxin. The thinner, orbicularis muscle (and even the procerus muscle) responds favorably to a more superficial, subcutaneous injection of Botox.

Unlike the other larger muscles of facial expression that may require direct contact of the toxin to the majority of the muscle mass, hence requiring injection more directly into the muscle, the relatively thin orbicularis muscle (and isolated procerus) seems to be satisfactorily affected by injecting the toxin into the subcutaneous space overlying the muscle. This not only reduces the chance of significant ecchymoses but may therefore maintain the potency that could be reduced by bleeding. Additionally, injection into the subcutaneous space may allow for more local (even) diffusion over the targeted muscle and provide an additional safety barrier to structures deep to the muscle. For lateral canthal rhytids (crow’s feet), three or four injections are given with particular avoidance of the pretarsal orbicularis of the upper and lower eyelid. This is achieved by directing needle insertion temporal to the lateral canthus near the lateral orbital rim and distant to the eyelid margin. The procerus muscle can be injected at one or two sites just beneath the (skin) transverse wrinkle at the nasal bridge. This superficial plane also avoids orbital injection. Hyperkinetic horizontal forehead furrows seem to respond favorably to either subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of the toxin, presumably since the frontalis is the only active muscle in this region. Weakening, rather than complete frontalis denervation, may also be preferable in some individuals to avoid brow ptosis. These injections are most effective by administering a uniform grid, whereby approximately nine or more sites are injected across the forehead. Three or more sites over each side are positioned in a vertical line above the mid-eyebrow. Additional sites are positioned vertically in the mid-forehead region. This affords focal frontalis muscle weakening at the medial aspects of each muscle group. A more homogeneous treatment of the forehead avoids focal areas of residual function that can become quite noticeable in lieu of complete absence of adjacent furrows. Typically, 2.5 units (0.1 ml) are administered at each site. Injections over the lateral eyebrow are minimized or avoided to reduce the potential for lateral eyebrow ptosis. Contrary to much of the reported concern regarding staying upright or avoiding physical activity for several hours after the injections,  I have not found it necessary to instruct patients on this. Cosmetics may be applied immediately after injection.

Although, theoretically, the effect of the toxin is described as occurring between 3 and 7 days after injection, I have noted consistently an earlier onset of effect compared with those patients who experience Botox for the treatment of eyelid and facial spastic disorders such as benign essential blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. Occasionally, a patient-recipient of Botox for hyperkinetic facial lines experiences the effects within several hours for reasons not well understood. Although the immediate treatment benefits reflect the toxins’ ability to temporarily weaken or paralyze those muscles responsible for the muscular component of the hyperkinetic facial lines, the theoretic suggestion (not yet proven) is that repeated injections into the same muscles over time could produce a sort of disuse atrophy that would limit the development of certain facial lines in younger individuals and possibly eliminate or reduce (over time) established facial lines and furrows.

However, because of the entity of axonal sprouting  (discussed earlier) and the fact that patients typically return for additional treatment after the muscles have regained near complete clinical function (i.e., the wrinkle has returned), true long-term muscular atrophy may not be the only possible cause for long-term improvement in some individuals that may also reflect (in part) alteration in facial animation patterns and remodeling of the overlying soft tissue.

Botulinum toxin A also has been shown to be useful for a variety of other facial cosmetic problems. I have found it useful in even subtle cases of aberrant regeneration of the facial (seventh cranial) nerve (for instance after recovery of a Bell’s palsy), which although it may not induce a significant visual impairment, poses significant embarrassment to some. At times, very low doses are quite effective such as 1.0 unit or less per site administered over the pretarsal orbicularis in the same manner given for the treatment of (benign essential) blepharospasm. Botox can also be used to achieve symmetry in congenital and acquired unilateral facial paralysis by weakening the contralateral side.

Eyebrow asymmetry can be seen in a variety of scenarios including facial nerve trauma after brow lifts, other surgically induced facial paralysis, habit in those with long-standing (even post-corrected) ipsilateral blepharoptosis, asymmetric nonpathologic facial expression, etc. As an alternative to brow lifting the more ptotic eyebrow, one could consider eyebrow (focal frontalis muscle) chemodenervation to enhance symmetry for those who are unwilling to undergo surgery but who desire a more symmetric appearance. The sites and number of injections depend on where the effect is desired and usually are administered into (or overlying) frontalis muscle approximately 1.0 cm above the eyebrow to avoid the brow depressors.

One can induce creative changes in the eyebrow shape and position. For instance, it is well known that with injection of Botox for glabellar frown lines into the medial eyebrow, the adjacent medial frontalis muscle can at times be affected (by a higher injection that weakens the frontalis muscle focally), inducing a mild relative medial brow ptosis and at times effecting a more pleasing contour to the eyebrow (especially in flat brows). Brow contour can be even more accentuated by effecting a mild lateral brow elevation by injecting the lateral (sub-brow) orbital component of the orbicularis muscle, enhancing the effect of the antagonist lateral frontalis muscle. This method can be employed when injecting for crow’s feet with extension of the lateral canthal area injections (2.5 units/0.1 ml) into the lateral sub-brow region.

Orbicularis (oculi) muscle hypertrophy of the lower eyelids may also be effectively treated using very low concentrations (1.0 unit/0.05 ml) of toxin into or overlying the visibly hypertrophic (thickened) muscle. Low doses may still cause a mild but often acceptable degree of lower eyelid retraction. Two or three injections are administered at the central lower eyelid and lateral canthus overlying the affected areas. Higher concentrations, however, may induce significant paralytic eyelid retraction or ectropion and may also impair the nasolacrimal pumping action of the orbicularis muscle, inducing epiphora.

Similar caution and consideration can be applied to tone down the effects of the zygomaticus major and minor muscles. The zygomaticus major muscle not only affects the elevation of the corner of the mouth with smiling but in doing this recruits the enhancement of crow’s feet, which can be quite exaggerated in some individuals. The zygomaticus minor muscle originates similarly to the zygomaticus major muscle and inserts more medially into the upper lip. Both of these muscles, in part, when active, deepen the nasolabial fold. By using low dosages (2.5 units/0.2 ml) in the proximal aspects (far from the mouth) near the areas of origin, with efforts made to inject toxin mostly at the level of the edge of the inferior aspect of the orbicularis of the lower eyelid , one can soften their additive effect on the lateral canthal rhytids and nasolabial folds. One or two injections administered over the mid to lateral malar eminence are usually satisfactory in obtaining the desired effect without incurring complications, particularly paralysis of the ipsilateral upper lip.

Finally, Botox has been shown to be useful as a primary treatment in reducing fine perioral rhytids (lip stick lines).  Approximately 1.0 to 1.5 units of toxin is injected adjacent to the fine vertical rhytids overlying the orbicularis oris muscle close to the vermilion ridge. An added noted aesthetic effect at times with this treatment is the appearance of fuller (pseudo-augmented) lips because the sphincter muscle is weakened along the vermilion border to assume a more everted position.

Those experienced with CO2 laser abrasion have noted the first recurrent rhytids in the lower eyelid and lateral canthus. At times, in patients where there is significant hyperdynamics especially at the lateral canthus and perioral region, the rhytids can actually appear worse after laser skin resurfacing by any method . Pretreatment with Botox may improve the smoothing effect of the new remodeled/resurfaced skin long enough to effect more permanent eradication of wrinkles.

Similarly, this approach may be beneficial in pretreatment for those individuals who will undergo brow lifting procedures by enhancing results from weakening the inferior vector force (lateral orbital orbicularis oculi muscle, the antagonist to the frontalis muscle and eyebrow elevation), which would promote and provide maintenance of the elevated eyebrow position.

Reinforcement during lateral canthal suspension procedures such as the lateral tarsal strip or the lateral retinacular suspension  can be aided by injecting Botox (2.5 units/0.1 ml) around the lateral canthus as in the method described for the treatment of lateral canthal rhytids that not only diminished the regional rhytids but also reduced local orbicularis oculi function that, in part, may compromise the position and security of the lateral canthus with repeated muscular contraction.

Another very useful application of Botox has been in patients with soft-tissue contour abnormalities or atrophy that benefit from the coincident use of both modalities. Preceding the injection or surgical placement of the soft-tissue augmentation material by approximately 1 week, Botox is administered for focal weakness or paralysis. Injection of the dermal filler, subdermal fat, or surgical implantation (of alloplastic or allogeneic material) is then given into the paralyzed or muscularly weakened area. The denervation serves at least three purposes. First, it eliminates or reduces the dynamic/muscular component of rhytid formation. Second, there is some theoretic suggestion that it may increase the longevity of the dermal implant by reducing the supposed mechanical inflammatory influence on atrophy of the implant. Third, it may also simply reduce the immediate microextrusion at the injection sites by repetitive muscular action, etc. This can be seen by weakening the medial brow depressors before administering collagen or fat to the glabella or injecting Botox to the lip elevators and depressors before soft-tissue augmentation of the nasolabial folds and in lip augmentation, respectively. Dosages to the glabella are similar to those used in the primary treatment to any particular region. Lower dosages (1.25 units/0.1 ml) may be applied to the lips before augmentation. The combination of chemodenervation and soft-tissue augmentation (particularly autologous collagen) in these areas has been shown to be highly synergistic.

Other Observations

Not uncommonly, patients after receiving Botox (not necessarily particular to one facial region but more prevalent in those injected in or around the eyebrows and forehead) note a generalized (almost euphoric) feeling of improved sense of well being. I have assumed that this could be related to the relief of muscular contraction (tension) etc., similar to that in the classic muscular contraction or tension headaches. This finding has been consistent and possibly suggests even more expanded uses for the toxin. Most effects for the various cosmetic applications of Botox last (as in the functional/spastic disorders) between 4 and 6 months. Patients must be counseled and aware of the typical (transient) effects of chemodenervation on their hyperfunctional lines and the likely need for maintenance treatment.

Complications

Reported adverse reactions with the general use of Botox for all approved applications include blepharoptosis, diplopia, globe perforations, retrobulbar hemorrhage, Adies pupil, worsening of dry eye symptoms, lagophthalmos, photophobia, epiphora, ectropion, and exposure keratitis.  Complications that have arisen with the cosmetic applications of Botox have included most of the above-noted reactions and additional unwanted temporary effects including ecchymoses, eyebrow ptosis and asymmetry, and mouth drop. Unwanted side effects, such as blepharoptosis and mild lower eyelid retraction , typically last only a few weeks at most as the dose of migrated toxin to the affected muscle is usually significantly reduced. The temporary use of over the counter ocular decongestants (eyedrops) that contain adrenergic agents (with coincidental side effects of the eyedrops that include temporary contraction of Muller’s muscle and an elevated upper eyelid margin position) for allergy/congestion (Naphcon A, Vasocon A, Opcon A) may prove beneficial to those patients who are significantly symptomatic from the transient blepharoptosis.

The use of Botox for the treatment of hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows is merely another effective primary or adjunctive therapy to offer your cosmetic patients in the spectrum of treatment options for full facial rejuvenation. Unwanted side effects can be minimized and beneficial effects maximized with a thorough understanding of the facial soft-tissue anatomy, proper patient selection, and administration of the lowest effective dosages with minimal volume of delivery. It most often does not replace surgery, skin resurfacing, soft-tissue augmentation, or skin care. However, it has been shown to be quite useful when used alone or in conjunction with the variety of treatment options to give your selected patients the most effective and comprehensive solutions for a more youthful appearance

DERMAL FILLERS - JUVEDERM - RESTYLANE - DR MICHELE KOO PLASTIC SURGEON - ST LOUIS-SPRINGFIELD-COLUMBIA-KANSAS CITY

Monday, January 19th, 2009

BEFORE JUVEDERM ULTRA PLUS INJECTION

BEFORE JUVEDERM ULTRA PLUS INJECTION

AFTER JUVEDERM ULTRA PLUS INJECTION

AFTER JUVEDERM ULTRA PLUS INJECTION

Introduction

Do you hate the creases and lines in your face? What about your thin lips and furrows? Do you feel that you have deep nasolabial folds?

Do you want to get rid of them in 30 minutes and return to work without any one knowing what you had done?

DR MICHELE KOO, MD, FACS, BOARD CERTIFIED PLASTIC SURGEON, ST LOUIS, MISSOURI can help you regain a fuller, less wrinkled face giving you back the youthful volume of your face without the down time.

For individuals seeking facial rejuvenation, injectable dermal fillers offer a viable nonsurgical option. At the 2008 annual meeting of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, various applications for dermal fillers were discussed. These included a hyaluronic acid (HA) gel filler, calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and collagen-based products.

Greater understanding of age-related facial changes has resulted in the growing use of soft-tissue facial dermal fillers. Recently, the focus has shifted towards a three-dimensional approach, emphasizing restoration of lost facial volume through the use of a variety of injectable dermal fillers that ideally afford patients a natural, relaxed, more youthful appearance.

Dermal fillers are appropriate for the correction of both dynamic and static fine, moderate, and deep dermal lines. It is extremely important to note, however, that each filler is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a specific and limited anatomical area and a specific use. Also, the use of fillers for the correction of lines in other areas, as well as restoration of facial volume lost in the aging process, although effective, is off-label. In fact, such fillers are used off-label the majority of the time.

Types of Dermal Fillers

Hyaluronic Acid Fillers

As a class, HA dermal fillers have quickly become an extremely popular option in minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, second only to botulinum toxin injections. HA is a naturally occurring polysaccharide found in connective tissue and synovial fluid. The various hyaluronan products currently available have differing properties that influence their duration of effect and adverse-effect profiles.  Specifically, they may differ in the degree of gel hardness or flow properties, particle size within the gel, concentration of HA particles and gel per milliliter, and ratio of soluble to insoluble HA. Different injection techniques, including “cross-hatching,” “fanning,” “serial puncture,” and “linear threading,” are recommended for specific areas of the face and for specific products. It is important that clinicians know which techniques and needle sizes are most appropriate for the selected product and facial area to be injected.

Drs. Pinsky, Goldman, and Boyd discussed the final efficacy, safety, and patient-satisfaction results of a new-generation HA gel filler. In an open-label trial, 9639 subjects were treated with a new smooth, cohesive, 24-mg/mL bacterially derived HA to correct moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds. Evaluation at 9 months post treatment found the new HA gel to be safe and effective, with high patient satisfaction and preference.

With a variety of products available, it is of paramount importance for clinicians to choose the correct product to achieve the desired effect in the specific facial area. Less viscous products are appropriate for the upper dermis, whereas larger-particle products may be preferred for deeper grooves or folds. Some products contain local anesthesia, but patients still may benefit from separate anesthesia (ice, topical anesthetic, field block or peripheral nerve block) prior to the injections. After injections, it is often recommended that the clinician gently massage the treated area to smooth and mold the material and that ice packs be applied by the patient at home. Finally, unlike other dermal filler materials, asymmetries associated with the use of HAs can be corrected with the use of hyaluronidase.

As with all dermal filler products, touch-ups may be necessary after the initial treatment session. A presentation by Cukurluoglu and colleagues highlighted the importance of informing patients of the possible need for touch-ups, particularly in the nasolabial sulcus, malar, and lip areas.

Calcium Hydroxylapatite

Calcium hydroxylapatite provides a filler effect of generally longer duration than the HA products, with its cosmetic effect persisting between 6 and 12 months. It is typically injected subcutaneously into the nasolabial fold or areas requiring deep soft-tissue applications, but is not appropriate for use in and around the lips owing to possible nodularity. Calcium hydroxylapatite is currently indicated for use in oral/maxillofacial defects, vocal cord insufficiency, and radiographic tissue marking, as well as cosmetically for the correction of folds and wrinkles such as nasolabial folds. It is awaiting approval for the correction of HIV-related facial lipoatrophy. Autogenous collagen forms around the injected calcium hydroxylapatite to hold it in position and maintain the result.

Fakhre and coworkers reported results of a meta-analysis and patient-centric outcomes study examining patient satisfaction with calcium hydroxylapatite for cosmetic nasolabial fold correction. The meta-analysis standardized patient-satisfaction results to a 5-point scale (with 5 representing the greatest level of satisfaction) derived from 5 studies involving a total of 324 patients. Results from the 28 surveys that were returned indicated that patients perceived their results to be in the good-to-very-good range at 1 week (mean, 3.4), 1 month (3.7), and 6 months (3.1), but considered their results fair (2.3) at 1 year. The investigators concluded that calcium hydroxylapatite affords a high level of patient satisfaction in the short term, but that the level of satisfaction does not persist over 1 year post treatment even though the hydroxylapatite itself does.

Poly-L-Lactic Acid

PLLA is currently approved by the FDA for the restoration and/or correction of the signs of facial lipoatrophy in patients with HIV. In addition, it is used in Europe and off-label in the United States for long-term contour (or large-volume) restoration in healthy patients.  PLLA is injected subcutaneously at 4- to 6-week intervals for a total of 2-5 treatment sessions; reports suggest that the results persist for up to 40 months. After a brief injection reaction causing volumizing effects, results do not become apparent for up to 2 months after the last treatment. PLLA is most appropriate for large-volume restoration in the cheeks and has also been used for cosmetic enhancement in the chin, temples, and infraorbital region. The most common adverse events associated with PLLA injections include nonvisible, palpable subcutaneous nodules and granulomas.

In a study (N = 233) presented by Fredric Brandt, MD, that compared the efficacy of injectable PLLA vs a commercially available human collagen implant in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles, there was overall improvement in over 88% for subjects treated with injectable PLLA. For patients who received human collagen implant, there was an overall improvement in 95.7% of patients (P < .001).The former group had significantly fewer postinjection product-related or injection-related adverse events reported among patients receiving PLLA vs collagen (P < .05 and P = .005, respectively).

Collagen-Based Products

Collagen-based products were among the original formulations used for soft-tissue augmentation. The need for hypersensitivity testing associated with bovine collagen led to the development and introduction of human-based collagens, which do not require allergy testing. Collagen injections are safe, but the effects are very temporary, persisting for only 3 months. Consequently, patients must undergo additional collagen injection treatments every few months to maintain the desired look.

Gordley and colleagues reported on a long-term assessment that compared 3 popular collagen-based products in the in vivo murine model: 2 materials involve a cadaveric dermal matrix and the third involves a porcine dermal matrix. All 3 products demonstrated similar encapsulation, peripheral infiltration, and surrounding inflammation upon histologic assessment. However, there was substantial variation between the 3 products on macroscopic evaluation, which likely caused the observed significant long-term variations in graft consistency and structure.

Combination Treatment

Aging influences many aspects of the underlying facial structure and external facial appearance, manifesting as wrinkles or furrows, changes in skin texture and color, and sagging. It is therefore understandable that a combination of therapies might be necessary to optimize the results of cosmetic rejuvenation. Combination approaches (all of which are off-label uses) can include layering dermal fillers at different depths and/or combining the use of dermal fillers to provide volume with neurotoxins, such as botulinum toxin A, to decrease muscle movement. Areas especially amenable to combination therapy include resting glabellar folds, horizontal forehead lines, nasojugal folds, and facial contouring of the zygomatic or perioral regions. Each product targets a specific area and concern, and combining them appropriately can optimize results by affecting both the dynamic and static components. In fact, it is now common for multiple areas to be treated in a single session.

Facial Areas Where Dermal Fillers Are Used

The face is typically divided into thirds when formulating a treatment plan: upper, middle, and lower. After this initial step, it is important that clinicians evaluate the entirety of the face, recognizing how rejuvenating one area may affect the appearance of other areas.[1] Clinicians must consider the individual’s needs, skin color, skin type, and facial shape, including extent of intrinsic and extrinsic facial aging.

Facial areas most amenable to correction with dermal fillers, besides the cheeks, are the nasolabial folds, periorbital area, prejowl depression, and perioral area. Monotherapy with botulinum toxin has historically been the treatment of choice for the upper face, but the addition of HA to botulinum toxin (either in the same treatment session or a subsequent treatment session) affords greater aesthetic improvements and nearly doubles the median duration of response. However, HA injections to the upper face should be performed by experienced clinicians to avoid the rare yet serious complication of necrosis.

Many clinicians use multiple dermal filler products depending on the need of the patient. Correction to the midface region is dependent upon the degree of facial volume loss. Botulinum toxin is often a secondary treatment to dermal fillers in this region, in contrast to the upper face. For correction of the nasolabial folds, clinicians recommend using more viscous filler products via fanning or linear threading techniques for flattening medial to the crease; less viscous products are typically used for the more superficial fine crease itself through serial puncture or linear threading. Because marionette lines and prejowl depressions are more superficial lines, they are typically addressed by mid-to-deep dermis injections using linear threading or serial puncture. Prejowl depressions may require deep subcutaneous injections. Fillers are often added to neurotoxins in and around the periorbital area, where deeper injections are recommended in order to avoid lumpiness.  Because the goal for correcting the lips or perioral rhytides is typically to provide fuller, more voluptuous lips, serial puncture and threading techniques are recommended.

Optimizing Treatment and Safety Considerations

Clinicians must be familiar with (1) which injection techniques and placements are used for each product; (2) the recommended follow-up treatments; and (3) which facial regions are indicated for each specific filler. Patient demographics have also expanded to include substantially more ethnic minorities and males. Differences in musculature between males and females can influence dosing needs and injection technique/placement. Skin color can affect underlying structure and architectural differences, as well as responses to ultraviolet damage. Clinicians must consider all of these factors — intrinsic and extrinsic aging, gender, ethnicity/skin color — before developing an individualized plan for facial rejuvenation. Finally, early complications associated with dermal fillers are typically transient and self-limited, including bruising, edema, and swelling around the injection sites. Although rare, there is the possibility of hypersensitivity reactions, asymmetries, and lumpiness, with longer follow-up of longer-lasting fillers sometimes revealing troublesome and deforming granuloma formation.

Conclusions

Injectable dermal fillers have become an important component of the aesthetic clinician’s armamentarium. The wide variety of dermal filler products allows clinicians to optimize desired results by individualizing patient treatment plans and using combination therapies when appropriate. Having a choice of products necessitates knowledge and comfort with the numerous options, particularly when products are used off-label. Appropriate patient selection, proper injection technique, and selection of the most appropriate product for the desired result in the targeted facial area(s) are key factors underlying patient satisfaction and product efficacy and safety.


back to the top